CVS Caremark Agrees To Pay $38.5M To Settle Allegations That It Did Not Pass On Rebates, Discounts To Patients, Employers
Main Category: Pharmacy / PharmacistAlso Included In: Litigation / Medical Malpractice; Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 18 Feb 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.4 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
CVS Caremark has agreed to a $38.5 million settlement in a multistate civil deceptive-practices lawsuit against pharmacy benefit manager Caremark filed by 28 attorneys general, the Chicago Tribune reports. The attorneys general, led by Lisa Madigan (D) of Illinois and Douglas Ganslar (D) of Maryland, allege that Caremark "engaged in deceptive business practices" by informing physicians that patients or health plans could save money if patients were switched to certain brand-name prescription drugs (Miller, Chicago Tribune, 2/14).
However, the switch often saved patients and health plans only small amounts or increased their costs, while increasing Caremark's profits, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (D) said (Levick, Hartford Courant, 2/15). Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett (R) said the PBM kept discounts and rebates that should have been passed on to employers and patients (Levy, AP/San Francisco Chronicle, 2/14). In addition, Caremark did not "adequately inform doctors" of the full financial effect of the switch and did not disclose that the switch would increase Caremark's profits, the lawsuit alleges (Chicago Tribune, 2/14).
Settlement
Under the settlement, Caremark will pay $38.5 million to 28 states and Washington, D.C. (AP/San Francisco Chronicle, 2/14). States will receive $22 million of the settlement, and they must use the funds to benefit low-income, disabled or elderly patients or to educate residents about cost difference among prescription drugs (Harris, Bloomberg/Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/15). Caremark must pay $2.5 million to reimburse plan members for the increased costs associated with switching to certain cholesterol treatments (AP/San Francisco Chronicle, 2/14). Caremark also will pay $16.5 million to reimburse states for the cost of the investigation (Chicago Tribune, 2/14).
In addition, the settlement prohibits Caremark from requesting prescription drug switches in certain cases, such as when the cost to the patient would be higher with the new prescription drug; when the original prescription drug's patent will expire within six months; and when patients were switched from a similar prescription drug within the previous two years (Hartford Courant, 2/15). Patients also have the ability to decline a switch from the prescribed treatment to the prescription offered by the pharmacy under the settlement, Madigan said (Bloomberg/Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/15).
Response
Caremark said it entered into the agreement to reaffirm its commitment to complying with consumer protection laws (Lade, South Florida Sun-Sentinel, 2/15). Caremark on Thursday said that the company and its subsidiaries have "expressly denied any and all allegations, and there has been no finding of wrongdoing or inappropriate business conduct on their part" (Hartford Courant, 2/15). The settlement "will not result in significant changes to current business practices," Caremark said (Chicago Tribune, 2/14). CVS Caremark said that the settlement will not affect the company's 2008 financial outlook (Bloomberg/Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/15).
Corbett said, "Caremark was operating against their clients' interests by retaining rebates and discounts that they were obligated to pass on to their clients," adding, "This agreement stops the deceptive business practices and takes the necessary steps to protect health plans and patients" (AP/San Francisco Chronicle, 2/14).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our pharmacy / pharmacist section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/97556.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/97556.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Been getting my meds from CVS for many many years
posted by Lorraine on 22 Jan 2011 at 11:53 amBeen getting my meds from CVS for many many years. Got my meds ony days and it was a generic drug that didn't lower my blood pressure. When I complained they wanted to charge me 125.00 for a six month supply when I was paying 17.00 for the same drug. What a rip-off. I could get the meds at a different CVS which is 20 miles away for 17.00 but I can't understand why this happened. Wish I could change pharmacy but insurance company only deals with them.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




