Medtronic Statement Regarding U.S. Supreme Court's Favorable Decision In Riegel V. Medtronic, Inc.
Main Category: Medical Devices / DiagnosticsAlso Included In: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 21 Feb 2008 - 4:00 PDT
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8 to 1 today in favor of Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) in Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. The decision reaffirms that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pre-market approval process for medical devices, which expertly balances the patient benefits and risks, appropriately preempts state tort lawsuits involving devices approved through that process.
The Court ruled that Congress has granted the FDA the exclusive authority to assess the proper balance in its pre-market review of the device. The decision of the Court is the first ever to rule on the legal effect of FDA pre-market device approval on tort lawsuits.
"This is a very important decision, which ensures that patients continue to have appropriate access to innovative, life-saving medical devices," said Bill Hawkins, Medtronic's president and CEO. "The decision recognizes the rights and interests of the vast majority of patients who benefit from a medical device."
About Medtronic
Medtronic, Inc., headquartered in Minneapolis, is the global leader in medical technology - alleviating pain, restoring health, and extending life for millions of people around the world.
Any forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties such as those described in Medtronic's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 27, 2007. Actual results may differ materially from anticipated results.
Medtronic, Inc.
Visit our medical devices / diagnostics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/98132.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/98132.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Supreme Court "Justice"??
posted by Steven C on 21 Feb 2008 at 6:33 pmIn view of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in ruling in favor of medical device manufacturers, one has to wonder why there seems to be some disparity between device manufacturers and drug manufacturers. After all, Phen-fen and Vioxx, were both approved by the FDA, just as this device was. Yet how many lawsuits were filed?? So if something is approved by the FDA and then found to harmful in some way, who is liable?? Everyone knows you will never win a law suit against the FDA itself, so what will the consumers have as protection now? I have some new respect for Justice Ginsberg now, for her dissenting opinion, even though I don't fully agree with all of her reasons. At least she took a stand to protect the American people, more than business interests.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



