Governors Oppose New Medicaid Regulations That Would Reduce Federal Funding For Services

Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP
Article Date: 26 Feb 2008 - 12:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


New federal Medicaid regulations scheduled to take effect this year would shift billions of dollars in costs to the states and could lead to a reduction in services, governors said last weekend during the winter meeting of the National Governors Association in Washington, D.C., the New York Times reports. The rules are scheduled to take effect over the next several months. Federal officials estimate that the rules will save $15 billion over five years. Dennis Smith, director of CMS' Center for Medicaid and State Operations, said the rules are needed to "protect the fiscal integrity of the Medicaid program."

One of the rules would prohibit states from using federal Medicaid funds to help pay for physician training, a use that has been allowed since the program began, according to the Times. Smith said that the Bush administration believes "that paying for graduate medical education is outside the scope of Medicaid's role, which is to provide care to low-income people," adding, "There is no explicit authorization under the Medicaid statute to subsidize the training of physicians." The federal government estimates the rule change will save $1.8 billion over five years, but officials from New York, where more than 15% of U.S. physicians are trained, said it would lose at least that much. Stan Rosenstein, California's Medicaid director, said using funds for physician training is justified because "interns and residents provide a tremendous amount of care to Medicaid beneficiaries."

Another rule would place new limits on Medicaid payments to hospitals and nursing homes operated by state and local governments. State governments are concerned that the rule could "eliminate federal contributions for a whole category of public spending on health care for the poor -- specifically, spending by autonomous units of local government," the Times reports. A third rule would limit coverage of rehabilitation services for people with disabilities, including those with mental illnesses.

Reaction
Vermont Gov. Jim Douglas (R), who chairs NGA's Health and Human Services Committee, said, "Governors strongly oppose the changes," adding, "The timing could not be worse." He added, "We can have a legitimate discussion about expanding [SCHIP]. But the Medicaid rules are different. They renege on commitments already made." Douglas said that "we've come to rely on Medicaid to help pay for special education and other services to children with disabilities."

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) said the rule changes "would effectively end the federal government's participation in many crucial components of the Medicaid program." California officials estimate that if the rules take effect, the state could lose $12 billion over five years.

The National Conference of State Legislatures also criticized what it called "the regulatory activism" of the new rules.

Additional Comments
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation -- the nation's largest municipal health care system, which gets 60% of its budget from Medicaid -- said the rules would have "a potentially devastating impact" and could force cutbacks in services. Deborah Bachrach, a deputy commissioner in the New York State Health Department, said, "The new Medicaid rules make it difficult to pay for current programs and nearly impossible to expand coverage to all."

Rhonda Medows, commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health, said, "We understand the need for financial safeguards, but these rules, taken together, would have a tremendous adverse impact," adding, "They would undermine the health care safety net for the entire state of Georgia, reducing federal Medicaid payments for hospitals, nursing homes and school clinics" (Pear, New York Times, 2/24).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Kaiser. "Governors Oppose New Medicaid Regulations That Would Reduce Federal Funding For Services." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 26 Feb. 2008. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/98535.php>

APA
Kaiser. (2008, February 26). "Governors Oppose New Medicaid Regulations That Would Reduce Federal Funding For Services." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/98535.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP

What is Medicare / Medicaid?

Medicaid and Medicare are two governmental programs that provide medical and health-related services to specific groups of people in the United States. Although the two programs are very different, they are both managed by the Centers for Medicare and... Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Medicare News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »