Recurrent Brain Cancer Responds To New Treatment
Main Category: Neurology / NeuroscienceAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology; Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 29 Feb 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.57 (7 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
One of the toughest cancers to treat effectively is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common form of primary brain cancer. Patients who have a recurrence of this cancer have had no effective therapy -- until now. Researchers at the University of Virginia and several other leading brain tumor centers nationwide have discovered that a compound has shown the ability to effectively treat GBM in some patients.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has an important biologic role in this disease in fostering tumor growth by facilitating the growth of new blood vessels to feed the tumor. According to earlier studies, bevacizumab (BV), a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets VEGF, in combination with irinotecan (also called CPT-11) could have a role in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. The researchers set out to determine the clinical benefit of BV, both alone and in combination with CPT-11, in a multicenter, randomized phase II trial.
The results, presented in late 2007 at the 12th annual Society for Neuro-Oncology meeting, were indeed promising for such an intractable disease. Study results substantially exceeded the pre-specified thresholds set for this work.
The primary endpoints were 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) defined as no clinical or MRI tumor growth and the objective response rate (ORR), which measures tumor shrinkage. Secondary endpoints included safety and survival. Response assessments were conducted by a blinded (without access to data on who took which drug(s)) and independent radiographic facility. All patients were followed for 24 weeks to determine efficacy and safety.
Evaluators at this independent facility assessing found that, when taking BV, 35.6 percent of patients on average had a 6-month survival with no progression of their cancer, and an objective response rate of 21.2 percent on average.
The combination of BV and CPT was even more effective, with results of 51 percent and 34.1 percent, respectively.
"Bevacizumab, taken alone or in combination with irinotecan, is well tolerated by most patients," said Dr. David Schiff, co- director of the UVA Neuro-Oncology Program. "The drug is active in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme that has failed to respond to any prior therapy."
The investigator group found similar results when they evaluated the patients. Those results showed that 44.7 percent of patients on average had a 6-month survival with no progression of their cancer, and an objective response rate of 38.8 percent on average. The combination therapy yielded results of 60.9 percent and 46.3 percent, respectively.
Patients on the study are still being treated and followed so that longer-term results will become available.
Known also by its brand name, Avastin, bevacizumab has already been approved for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer and most forms of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
In addition, UVA is planning and conducting additional brain tumor clinical trials with bevacizumab and other anti-VEGF agents.
University of Virginia Health System
PO Box 800795
Charlottesville, VA 22908-0795
United States
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu
Visit our neurology / neuroscience section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/98965.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/98965.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
VEGF Blockade Can Damage Brain Vessels
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 3 Mar 2008 at 8:14 amDrugs commonly mixed with brain tumors are temodar, thalidomide, tamoxifen and accutane. However, Avastin has shown activity in many solid tumor types. One of the most popular combinations for brain tumors is Camptosar (CPT-11) and Avastin.
Avastin targets a protein called VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) that stimulates blood vessel growth. Avastin inhibits the growth of tumors by cutting off their blood supply, which deprives them of oxygen and other nutrients.
In a small percentage of patients, however, Avastin can cause neurological side effects ranging from headaches and blurry vision to potentially fatal seizures and brain swelling.
A new study revealed that VEGF normally protects the specialized cells that create a seal between the brain and spinal column and thus prevent fluid from leaking into the brain. When VEGF was blocked in mice, these cells died and the animals developed brain swelling.
The authors of the study suspected that Avastin's side effects in humans may be caused by a similar phenomenon. Why these symptoms occur in only a few patients is not yet known.
Many of these new targeted drug therapies often get a pass on toxicities because they are just so darn cool. The problem is that few drugs work the way oncologists think and few of them take the time to think through what it is they are using them for. The scientist in the lab most likely knows this, but the medical oncologist most likely does not.
As with most targeted therapy drugs, Avastin does not necessarily benefit every patient and it is expensive. Until recently, there were no tests that existed to show reliably who would benefit from anti-angiogenic agents. There is a bio-marker assay developed for microvascular viability to identify potential responders not only to Avastin, but Nexavar, Sutent, and other anti-angiogenic drugs.
Every cancer patient should have his/her own unique chemotherapy trial based on consultation of pathogenic profiles and drug sensitivity testing data. Research and application of these tests are being encouraged by growing patient demands, scientific advances and medical ethics.
These pre-tests are not a luxury but an absolute necessity, and a powerful strategy that cannot be overlooked.
Literature Citation:
Eur J Clin Invest 37 (suppl. 1):60, 2007.
J. Exp. Med. 2008 doi:10.1084/jem.2052iti5
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



