- Researchers investigated a new oral delivery system for mRNA treatments.
- The delivery system was able to deliver mRNA directly to the stomach linings of mice and pigs.
- Further research on larger animals and humans is needed to understand its clinical safety and efficacy.
DNA is converted into mRNA that translates to make proteins. mRNA technology works by inserting new mRNA into cells to code for new proteins.
As mRNA vaccines require shorter time frames for development than other vaccine types, they could play an essential role in controlling pandemic diseases.
As mRNA-based drugs
Developing a way to deliver mRNA treatments and vaccines via a pill may increase mRNA drug acceptance by both patients and clinicians and enable better targeting of the GI tract.
In a recent study, researchers led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge investigated an oral delivery method for mRNA treatments.
The researchers found that their new delivery method successfully delivered mRNA treatments in animal models.
“When you have systemic delivery through intravenous injection or subcutaneous injection, it’s not very easy to target the stomach,” says Alex Abramson, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University and co-lead author of the study. “We see this as a potential way to treat different diseases that are present in the gastrointestinal tract.”
The study appears in the journal
The MIT researchers have been developing ways to deliver drugs to the gastrointestinal tract for many years. In
SOMA’s design was inspired by the leopard tortoise. In a manner similar to how the tortoise reorients itself by rolling onto its back, the capsule first positions itself and then injects its contents into the stomach lining.
Study co-author Giovanni Traverso, the Karl Van Tassel career development assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at MIT and a gastroenterologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, told Medical News Today:
“The ingestible capsule can self-orient, auto inject a solution of the mRNA into the stomach wall, and then retract its needle. The mRNA nanoparticles are then taken up by the tissue, and the protein is translated.”
In the present study, the researchers set out to determine if the same capsule could also deliver mRNA molecules to the stomach lining.
From previous work, they found that a type of nanoparticles called poly(beta-amino esters) is more effective than other materials at protecting mRNA before reaching its target site. They thus used these polymers to protect mRNA in their experiments.
The researchers first tested whether the polymers could protect mRNA from degradation in the stomach. To do so, they injected polymer-encased mRNA for a reporter protein into the stomachs of mice. In this experiment, they did not use SOMA.
They note that the reporter protein was expressed in both the stomachs and the liver of the mice. This meant that the mRNA had been absorbed by other organs and then carried to the liver, which filters the blood.
Afterward, the researchers freeze-dried the mRNA-nanoparticle complexes and put them into their SOMA capsules. Together with scientists at Novo Nordisk, they loaded 50 micrograms of mRNA into each capsule and then delivered three each into the stomachs of pigs.
While the reporter protein was successfully produced in the pig’s stomach cells, the researchers note it did not spread to other organs.
To explain the differences between the pig and mouse models, the researchers say that higher doses of their formulation may have been needed to detect the reporter protein in pigs.
When asked why the reporter protein was produced only in the stomach lining among pigs and not in other organs as with mice, Dr. Traverso added that the different results also might be the result of different testing methods used to identify the proteins:
“The key difference between the [pig and mouse] models was that the rodent model has an inbuilt reporter with a green fluorescent protein which is produced for expression. For the pigs, we had to sample tissue and look for expression with immunohistochemical means.”
“Given this, one of the potential explanations is a technical one insofar as it [is] more challenging to test through immunohistochemistry in a large organ. We are exploring other mRNA molecules that can serve as better markers as we continue to develop these technologies,” he added.
Dr. Piotr Kowalski, Ph.D., HRB emerging investigator for health at University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, not involved the study, told MNT, “mRNA nanoparticles contained in SOMA and released via milli-needle injection will facilitate protein production primarily in the cells located close to the injection site, since the relatively large size of the nanoparticles makes it difficult for them to migrate to the systemic circulation through the stomach lining.”
The researchers conclude that SOMA can bypass the degradative enzymes in the GI tract and deliver mRNA medications directly to the stomach lining.
The researchers note some limitations to their research. Firstly, additional large animal models and human trials are needed to understand the clinical safety and efficacy of the method.
Furthermore, nanoparticle-optimization may reduce degradation after injection, and therapeutic mRNA, such as mRNA vaccines, should be tested.
When asked about possible use cases for the technology, Dr. Traverso said:
“The technologies can be applied to a broad set of conditions where mRNA can help. From local therapy to vaccines to systemic therapy. For vaccine delivery, we need to characterize the immunologic response when vaccination occurs via the GI tract, which we are doing.”
Dr. Kowalski added, “It is too early to discuss the potential uses of this technology. Oral vaccination could ease the burden of needle phobia and allow self-administration, but further research is needed to evaluate SOMA’s ability to safely and reproducibly deliver the required dose of mRNA via the oral route into the immune cells — e.g. antigen-presenting cells — to induce robust immune responses.”