Scientists claim method is potentially more accurate than PSA and could minimize predicament of over-diagnosis at screening.
Scientists in Ireland have developed a technique they hoped would be a more reliable and accurate method to detect prostate cancer, in findings recently published by the peer-reviewed open access scientific journal Advances in Modern Oncology Research (AMOR).
Prostate cancer, afflicting mostly male over age 60, is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men (after skin cancer) and is among the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men, according to World Health Organization.
Common screening routines for prostate cancer are blood test to detect elevated level of a protein produced by the prostate called prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and/or a digital rectal exam (DRE) in which a doctor feels the prostate through the rectum to search for lumps known as nodules.
If PSA or DRE test results are abnormal, there are several tests which can be administered to help confirm a diagnosis of prostate cancer, according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology's recommendation. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for instance, uses magnetic fields to produce detailed images of the body and measure the tumor's size.
A transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) test, meanwhile, is a procedure in which a doctor inserts a probe into the rectum to capture images of the prostate using sound waves. TRUS is usually done at the same time as another test: core needle biopsy, in which a thin, hollow needle pierces through the rectum wall to remove a small core prostate tissue for microscopic examination.
While other tests may suggest that cancer is present, only a biopsy can usually make a definite diagnosis. However, the Trinity College Dublin scientists led by Diarmaid C Moran and Laure Marignol noted that only 25%-30% of men with moderately elevated PSA eventually have prostate cancer confirmed at biopsy, and therefore many biopsies may ultimately prove unnecessary.
Despite PSA still being recommended after a confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer, new clinical screening tools and strategies are clearly required to decrease the unnecessary biopsy rate. Hence, "there is a growing demand for individualized treatment plans, which necessitates the accurate characterization of the location, extent and aggressiveness of the tumor," Moran and Marignol's team stated.
According to the scientists, "There has been great interest in determining the presence or absence of tumor non-invasively with combined anatomical and functional MRI." Their findings proposed combining high resolution images and functional techniques using MRI upon diagnosis based on TRUS-guided biopsy performed.
"MRI is well-validated for local staging of prostate cancer using qualitative assessment, including high-resolution T2W images once the diagnosis has been established by TRUS biopsy," they noted.
The study sought to determine the accuracy of three Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) threshold values in detecting prostate cancer prior to prostate biopsy in patients undergoing endorectal diffusion weighted (DW)-MRI.
Variations in cellular structure between benign and malignant tissue would manifest as differences in water diffusion. These differences can be exploited to improve prostate cancer detection qualitatively but also quantitatively by measuring changes in the ADC to potentially measure the aggressiveness of the tumor, according to the scientists.
The Dublin team studied 60 men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent endorectal DW-MRI at 3.0 Tesla. Three ADC threshold values (tADC: 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4x10-3 mm2/s) were sequentially applied to ADC maps for the detection of malignant lesions in the prostatic peripheral zone.
The results, specifically at tADC 1.0x10-3 mm2/s, proved "considerably more accurate than PSA alone and offers promise as a tool for not only screening of peripheral zone prostate cancer but potentially also for characterizing its aggressiveness," their findings noted. This concept is particularly important in the context of over-diagnosis and over-treatment of clinically insignificant cancers.
The study duly acknowledged that more large-scale, adequately powered, randomized and standardized studies are needed to determine whether Gleason-score-specific [the most common grading system for prostate cancer's prognosis] ADC values can be established.
"If this could be achieved, incorporation of ADC values into a diagnostic algorithm in combination with other clinical parameters such as PSA and DRE might ultimately allow low-risk patients to forego biopsy," the scientists said.
Additionally, for patients undergoing a policy of active surveillance, decrease in the ADC values over baseline during serial follow-up might signal an imperative for change to active treatment, they concluded.