Sunbeds And UV Classed As Definitely Cancer-Causing
Featured ArticleMain Category: Melanoma / Skin Cancer
Also Included In: Public Health; Radiology / Nuclear Medicine; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 29 Jul 2009 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.4 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Global health experts have moved use of sunbeds and exposure to ultraviolet radiation (including sun exposure) to the highest risk category for causing cancer: they now join agents such as tobacco, asbestos and benzene in being classed as "carcinogenic to humans" whereas before they were classed as "probably carcinogenic".
The move follows a new report reviewing available research that found that starting to use sunbeds before the age of 30 increased a person's risk of developing the deadliest form of skin cancer by 75 per cent. Other agents have also been moved to the highest risk category following the report.
The findings that led to the decision by the World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to reclassify the cancer risk of sunbeds, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and other agents, are published in a Special Report in the August issue of The Lancet Oncology.
The report was written by Dr Fatiha El Ghissassi and other IARC members based in Lyon, France, on behalf of the WHO IARC Monograph Working Group.
The IARC reviews the latest research and assigns one of five risk categories to different agents such as chemicals and types of radiation as follows:
- Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans.
- Group 2A: The agent is probably carcinogenic to humans.
- Group 2B: The agent is possibly carcinogenic to humans.
- Group 3: The agent is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans.
- Group 4: The agent is probably not carcinogenic to humans.
Their assessments will be published as part D of Volume 100 of the IARC Monographs.
The Special Report describes why sunlamps and sunbeds, and UV radiation, which were previously classified as Group 2A: "The agent is probably carcinogenic to humans", are now in the highest group, Group 1: "The agent is carcinogenic to humans".
The authors said people in many developed countries now make regular use ultraviolet radiation (UV) emitting tanning devices such as sunbeds and sunlamps, especially young women.
As a result of a "comprehensive meta-analysis" of the available research, they concluded that:
"The risk of skin melanoma is increased by 75 per cent when use of tanning devices starts before 30 years of age."
A meta-analysis is a way of pooling the results of several studies and analysing the data as if it came from one large study. Researchers using this method also have strict criteria for including and excluding studies: for instance if its design is questionable then a study is left out of the analysis.
El Ghissassi and colleagues also referred to several case-control studies that provided consistent evidence that there was a strong link beween the use of UV tanning devices and melanoma of the eye.
Radiation from the sun is the main source of human exposure to UV radiation, which comprises UVA, UVB and UVC rays.
95 per cent of solar radiation that reaches the earth's surface is UVA, the other 5 per cent is UVB, while UVC is blocked by the atmosphere's stratospheric layer.
The authors wrote that:
"Epidemiological studies have established a causal association between exposure to solar radiation and all major types of skin cancer."
Also, until now, it was thought that the gene mutation that is caused by UV radiation from the sun was caused only by UVB rays, but experiments on mice have shown that UVA can also cause the mutation and skin tumours. Thus the IARC has moved UV radiation as a whole (UVA, UVB and UVC) to Group 1. These were all in Group 2 before.
Welders came under special attention in the report, but the authors were not able to conclude from the evidence available if the occurrence of melanoma of the eye in that group was as a result of UV radiation alone, or other agents or both. The authors said:
"A full review of the carcinogenic hazards of welding will be undertaken with high priority."
The IARC has also moved all types of ionising radiation into Group 1. This was the first time that all types of ionising radiation have been reviewed by one team of experts.
Ionising radiation includes:
- Radon gas, which damages the lungs. It can seep from soil, rocks and building materials. The Special Report says radon gas is the second leading cause of lung cancer after tobacco smoke.
- Plutonium and its decay products. These affect the bones, liver and lungs of people who work with plutonium, for instance in nuclear plants.
- Radium and its decay products. These affect the bones of patients being treated with radium, for instance for prostate and other cancers.
- Phosphorous-32 and its decay products. These cause acute leukaemia in medical patients (phosphorous-32 is used for example to treat inoperable cancer tumors).
- Radioiodines (radioactive isotopes of iodine). These can cause thyroid cancer in children and adolescent survivors of nuclear reactor accidents or who are exposed to fallout from nuclear tests.
Fatiha El Ghissassi, Robert Baan, Kurt Straif, Yann Grosse, Béatrice Secretan, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Crystal Freeman, Laurent Galichet, Vincent Cogliano, on behalf of the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group
The Lancet Oncology, Vol 10 August 2009, Special Report: Policy.
-- IARC Monographs.
Sources: The Lancet Oncology, WHO.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/159124.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/159124.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Humans Need UV Light!
posted by Lisa on 4 Aug 2009 at 4:39 pmResponse to Article that Declares UV as "carcinogenic"
No study has EVER been done on the damaging effects of UV exposure, only on the damaging effects of UV over-exposure (sunburn)
The studies used to draw this conclusion, which can be excluded for ANY reason (including opposing conclusion) are often funded by the very industry who benefits from convincing you that the sun is bad: the sunblock/sunscreen industry (a 35 BILLION dollar industry)
Humans NEED UV light to live!
A tan is the best way to avoid burning. Its a natural sunscreen with no chemicals (chemicals in sunscreen include chemicals that "might be cancer causing")
The "study's" conclusion is the equivalent of saying that water causes drowning, therefore we should avoid water!
In countries where sunscreen is NOT used (3rd World), melanoma (skin cancer) rates are low or almost non-existant
Statistically, cases of melanoma are going DOWN for people who are born in 1980 and after (30 and under)
There are MORE cases of skin cancer on people who work indoors than on people who work in the sun all day
Melanoma more often occurs on areas of the body that are not recieving UV light (armpits, bottom of feet, etc.)
UV is a major source of Vitamin D (the Vitamin D you get from a tan is the equivalent of drinking 100 glasses of whole milk) and Vitamin D actually PREVENTS cancer, as well as many other diseases/conditions (MS, Osteoperosis, etc.)
UV OVER-EXPOSURE (SUNBURN) is dangerous...everybody knows that!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




