Calcium Supplements May Increase Risk Of Heart Attacks
Featured ArticleMain Category: Nutrition / Diet
Also Included In: Cardiovascular / Cardiology; Bones / Orthopedics; Heart Disease
Article Date: 30 Jul 2010 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.21 (29 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.67 (24 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 13 posts |
An international team of researchers that reviewed data from several trials found that taking calcium supplements was linked to a higher risk of heart attack and other cardiovascular events; the authors called for new research to re-assess the role of calcium supplements in the treatment of osteoporosis.
In the 29 July online issue of the BMJ you can read a report on how Dr Ian Reid, a professor of Medicine at the University of Auckland in New Zealand, and colleagues from the University of Aberdeen in the UK and Dartmouth Medical School in the US, found that people taking calcium supplements had between 27 and 31 per cent higher risk of heart attack than counterparts who took placebo.
Reid and colleagues also found smaller, but non-significant, increases in the risk of stroke and death.
Many older people take calcium supplements for osteoporosis. This is probably because research shows calcium supplements may marginally reduce the risk of fracture, and most guidelines suggest people make sure their diet contains enough calcium as a way to protect against or manage osteoporosis, wrote the researchers in their background information.
But a recent trial found calcium supplements may increase the rate of heart attack (myocardial infarction) and cardiovascular events in healthy older women, so Reid and colleagues decided to investigate further by conducting a meta-analysis (a study that pools and re-analyzes results from lots of other studies and as if they belonged to one giant study).
They searched established sources for published reports of trials that met their criteria. The trials had to be randomized, placebo-controlled trials that ran for at least one year and examined the effect of calcium supplements (dose of 500 mg per day or higher) on at least 100 participants of average age of 40 years.
They found 15 trials that matched their criteria: 5 had patient-level data covering over 8,000 participants over a median follow-up of 3.6 years, and 11 had trial-level data covering nearly 12,000 participants and a mean duration of 4 years.
For the 5 studies that yielded patient-level data, the researchers found:
- A 31 per cent higher risk of heart attack in the people who took calcium supplements compared to those who took placebo (143 on calcium versus 111 on placebo; hazard ratio HR 1.31, 95 per cent confidence interval CI ranged from 1.02 to 1.67, statistical significance P=0.035).
- An increase in stroke risk, but this was not significant (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.50, P=0.11).
- Non-significant increases in risk of death and a composite end-point comprising sudden death, heart attack or stroke.
- 27 per cent higher risk of heart attack in the people who took calcium supplements compared to those who took placebo (166 vs 130, pooled relative risk 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.59, P=0.038).
"Calcium supplements (without coadministered vitamin D) are associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction."
They found the results were independent of age, sex, and type of supplement and consistent across trials.
Although the risk they found was not large, because so many people take supplements it could mean a large burden of disease in the population as a whole, warned the authors.
Other studies have shown that people with high calcium intake that comes from their diet as opposed to supplements do not have a higher risk of heart attack or stroke, suggesting that perhaps the risk is limited to supplements.
Given that calcium supplements only modestly improve bone density and prevent fracture, their role in the management of osteoporosis should be re-assessed, urged the authors.
In an accompanying editorial, John Cleland a cardiology professor at the University of Hull in the UK, and colleagues, wrote that as a general rule, people with osteoporosis should only receive calcium supplements, either alone or with vitamin D, if they are also undergoing effective treatment for osteoporosis.
"Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis."
Mark J Bolland, Alison Avenell, John A Baron, Andrew Grey, Graeme S MacLennan, Greg D Gamble, Ian R Reid.
BMJ, 2010;341:c3691; Published online 29 July 2010
DOI:10.1136/bmj.c3691
Additional source: American Academy of Neurology.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/196310.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/196310.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (13)
Calcium Supplements May Increase Risk Of Heart Attacks
posted by Sheila B on 30 Jul 2010 at 5:17 amWho paid for the study? Did they also study calcium taken with Vitamin D? Is there a relationship between the funders of the study and manufacturers of Bisphosphonates or other medications associated with osteoporosis?
When important studies are discussed in public media, the source of funding should always be disclosed.
Sheila
Calcium
posted by Barbara on 30 Jul 2010 at 7:44 amI am ON Evista and Calcium D for the treatment of osteoprosis. i've been on Evista for 5 years. This study does not deal with the many people in the same boat. What is one to do? We definitely need more information.
Calcium supplementation
posted by J Higgins on 30 Jul 2010 at 9:20 amWhat kind of calcium? That can also make a difference! Is it citrate or oyster shell, or some other calcium composition? What manufacturer(s) of calcium?
Did the study participants have any other underlying conditions? Were those people at risk for heart attacks anyway?
And, yes, who funded the study? What might their motivation be?
Also, I hate headlines like this because it actually should read: 'Study finds that certain calcium supplements without co-administered vitamin D may cause heart attacks.' The Vitamin D information is buried near the end of the article. Some people may read the headline and stop taking calcium without realizing that they may only need to take Vitamin D along with it!
This does not surprise me
posted by Erica Peirson on 30 Jul 2010 at 9:30 amThe previous comments about funding and the need for more information are very valid. However, even as a Naturopathic physician, I've always believed that calcium supplementation was over-rated. The process of swallowing a calcium pill does not guarantee that the calcium will end up in your bones. Your body needs to have the right environment and other vitamin cofactors present for this to happen. For example, if one's system is too acidic from drinking carbonated beverages, not eating enough vegetables or eating too much protein, the body buffers that acidity by pulling calcium from the bones and out into the urine. Many studies have shown that as urine pH decreases (acidic) the amount of calcium in the urine increases. Vitamin D is not the only cofactor needed for the proper absorption of calcium. Vitamin K2 (from vegetables and healthy gut flora), magnesium, manganese and boron are also needed to mobilize calcium from the blood stream to bones. Basically, eat more greens. It's never as simple as taking one pill or supplement. See a licensed Naturopath if you want a comprehensive treatment plan for optimal bone health.
Calcium should be taken with magnesium
posted by Adam McLaurin on 31 Jul 2010 at 5:46 amA while back I read an article called 'Calcium Supplement: The Best Form Of Calcium To Take For Bone Health' from a website called 'The Healthier Life'.
This article was very helpful describing the various forms of calcium and which are best, but one thing that it said that's very interesting is that calcium taken alone may stick to the arterial walls rather than be laid down in bone. They say that calcium and magnesium in nature are always found together, and therefore should be taken together.
If this is true, it would explain the outcome of this study. It'd probably be a worthwhile followup for them to see a) what kind of calcium people were taking, and b) were they taking it with magnesium
Anyway, I'd post a link to the article I referred to, but I'm not sure of the policy here, so you can go find it yourself if you're interested!
Disturbing findings - calcium, what about vitamin D
posted by J Saleh on 1 Aug 2010 at 6:43 amI treat Osteoporosis on a daily basis. Calcium supplements are cornerstone of our treatment, but I always prescribe them with Vitamin D. If the patient however has sufficient vit D3 levels I would prescribe only calcium on it its own. And here is my concern according to this study.
I believe we should not advise our patients against calcium supplements and should wait to gather more solid findings.
A new study should compare the same brand of calcium supplement without vitamin d to another study group who take calcium with vitamin D.
calcium supplements
posted by Stan Echols on 3 Aug 2010 at 12:40 pmSometimes I feel like I just woke up in a Woody Allen movie. I can now add calcium to my list of recommendations/precautions from various experts. Already on the list is dark chocolet, red wine, coffee, tuna, and vitamins a, c and e. I'm happy to make appropriate lifestyle and diet changes to improve my health. But it's a bit unnerving to be told a short time later that I may be killing myself, substituting one problem for another, or simply wasting money. I think I'll go have a slice of cheesecake.
Increased bone density
posted by Ron Horgan on 4 Aug 2010 at 8:20 pmI have submitted a post detailing a 22% increase in the neck of the femur and a 32% increase in the lower lumbar vertibrae.
This result for my wife was due to a combination of vibration, suppliments including calcium and a brief treatment with bisphophonate.
Full details were provided and I am rather disappointed that you have not published this information.
If it was due to some technical requirement please advise me by e mail so that I may redraft it accordingly.
Best Wishes Ron Horgan
Which? Calcium with or without Vitamin D?
posted by Carolyn Partain on 4 Aug 2010 at 9:56 pmI could not understand the sentence in the last paragraph, "In an accompanying editorial, John Cleland...wrote that as a general rule, people with osteoporosis should only receive calcium supplements, either alone or with vitamin D, if they are also undergoing effective treatment for osteoporosis." OK, which is more advisable, calcium supplements"alone" or "with vitamin D" for the treatment of osteoporosis? Please rephrase for my senior-aged comprehension.
Expert Calls Calcium Study Absurd
posted by Michael Mooney on 5 Aug 2010 at 8:24 amSeveral rebuttals to this poorly constructed biased study are available. Try this one to start: http://www.michaelmooney.net/CalcuimStudyAbsurd.html
then read: http://www.npicenter.com/anm/templates/newsATemp.aspx?articleid=28263&zoneid=2
Statements about one type of calcium being superior or causing problems is basically nonsense. See: http://www.michaelmooney.net/CalCarbSuperior.htm. Yes, calcium does better when partnered with the 11 or so other nutrients that build bone, but studies are clear, calcium builds bone density used alone. See the study by Storm on page 8: http://www.supernutritionusa.com/images/pdfs/CalciumCarbonate.pdf#zoom=100.
Michael Mooney
First 10 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







