US Patients Going Straight To Emergency Department, Bypassing Personal Physicians
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Primary Care / General Practice
Also Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 07 Sep 2010 - 14:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
Every wondered why emergency departments in the USA are so crowded? The answer seems to be in people's changing behaviors over the last few years. Today, only 45% of the 354 million yearly visits for acute care in the USA are made to the patient's personal doctor, while an enormous number are going straight to emergency departments, seeing specialists, or turning up at outpatient care departments as their first point of call for treatment for new health problems, episodes, or a flare-up of a chronic health condition, such as diabetes or asthma.
Put simply, for readers outside the USA - Americans are seeing their GP (general practitioner) less and less and going straight to hospital as their first point of call more and more often.
A study found more than a quarter of all acute care visits in US now made to emergency departments.
This is not good news for America's often understaffed and extremely busy emergency rooms, according to an article published in Health Affairs.
- Fewer than 5% of American doctors are emergency physicians
- Emergency physicians handle over 28% of all acute care encounters in the country
- Over 50% of acute care visits by the under- and uninsured are handled by emergency physicians in America
Co-author, Steven Pitts, MD, associate professor of medicine in the Emory School of Medicine and a staff physician at Emory University Hospital Midtown, wrote:
Timely access to care is important, especially for those who are acutely ill. First-contact care has been a central tenet of primary care. But over the past few decades, the focus of primary care has shifted as a result of a growing elderly population, the growing burden of chronic disease and the challenge of coordinating care across multiple physicians. Low rates of reimbursement have accelerated this trend by forcing many primary care physicians to pack their daily schedules with 15-minute office visits - leaving little time for patients with acute health problems.
The study spanned from the beginning of 2001 through to the end of 2004. It showed that in America:
- An average of 1.09 billion outpatient visits were made annually to physicians
- On average, there were 321 visits per 1,000 people each month
- 351 million encounters per year were for acute care - treatment of new problems or a flare-up of a chronic health condition.
- 22% of acute care visits were dealt with by a GP (general practitioner, primary care physician)
- 10% of acute care visits were dealt with by a general internist
- 13% of acute care visits were dealt with by a pediatrician. A significant number involved treatment for minor upper respiratory conditions, such as a sore throat or a cough.
- Specialists in their own practices handled 20% of acute care visits, generally for their specialized medical areas, such as skin, eyes or orthopedic problems.
- 28% of acute care visits were dealt with by hospital emergency departments; mostly for more complex and potentially dangerous conditions, such as fever, chest pain, or stomach and/or abdominal pain.
One of the biggest barriers to providing acute care in primary care practice is that many primary care doctors have packed schedules. This makes "same day" scheduling, much less treatment of walk-in patients, extremely difficult.
"Busy schedules also discourage primary care physicians from taking the time they need to treat patients with complex, undifferentiated complaints. It is faster and simpler to refer them to a specialist or the nearest emergency department. Ensuring timely access to primary care is a desirable goal, because it increases a person's odds of finding a "medical home". Unfortunately, for many years now, primary care in the U.S. has been in decline. Patients have adapted by seeking care elsewhere when they get sick.
Pitts added:
Our data indicate that more than half of acute visits today involve a doctor other than the patient's personal physician. Dr. Pitts adds, "More than a quarter of all acute care visits, including virtually all weekend and "after hours" encounters, occur in hospital emergency departments. Heavy use of emergency departments for problems that a primary care provider could treat, if their patients could get in to see them, is not desirable from a societal perspective. Too often, emergency care is disconnected from patients' ongoing health care needs.
When your life is on the line, emergency departments are vital, Kellerman commented. When they can't get care elsewhere, Americans know that there is always a doctor on duty in the ER.
Kellerman said:
Strengthening primary care is a major goal of healthcare reform. If successful, it will be a win for everybody.
"Emergency Department Use - Where Americans Get Acute Care: Increasingly, It's Not At Their Doctor's Office"
Stephen R. Pitts, Emily R. Carrier, Eugene C. Rich and Arthur L. Kellermann
Health Affairs, 29, no. 9 (2010): 1620-1629
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1026
Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/200254.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/200254.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
How many were sent to ER?
posted by Ray Collins on 7 Sep 2010 at 5:29 pmHow many people were sent to ER by their primary caretaker? How many did not have a primary physician? How many primary physicians adequately monitor their diabetic or asthmatic patients, making ER visits less likely? Other blogs have more complete information about ER visits divided by time of day, e.g., office hours or after hours visits.
My doctor is too busy.......
posted by PJR on 8 Sep 2010 at 5:52 amMy own firsthand experience has been that my doctor is too busy to see me when I am ill. This is amazing since he is in a group practice with 7 other internists! Yet I am still told I have to wait a day or two to get in or I am directed to either the ER or Urgent Care (an off-shoot of the ER department which is open only during hours when the primary care offices are closed). If I am cooking at over 101.5 with other symptoms indicative of a bacterial infection, I am not hanging around for an extra 48 hours - I'm hauling my carcas off to the urgent care department. I only wish I had the moxy to bill my primary care office for the difference in the copay - a whopping $45.00 more.
Numbers Not Surprising
posted by InnerCityMedicine Networks on 6 Apr 2011 at 5:50 amSince the late 1980's, Americans have been trained to pick their primary care doctor via an employer-based health plan system/directory. Not all that personal from the jumpstart, and kind of like looking in the yellow pages for a doctor. Of course, if you are not employed, or your boss does not offer health benefits which is the case with millions of ethnic minorities, migrant, and cash-only service workers you have no such opportunity to choose a primary care practitioner.
Americans have also been sarcastically trained to know "not to call" their primary doctor's office for seemingly benign health concerns because the doctor is all too often too busy to talk to you because he/she is either seeing dozens of other HMO patients, stuck on the phone with nagging insurance companies, or behind schedule returning from hospital rounds.
So if a patient has an early onset acute bacterial/viral syndrome, or chest or abdominal discomfort they lose that valuable early primary care diagnostic window by ignoring the early warning signs or inappropriately self-treating. All it takes is 24-48 hours of delay for a seemingly low-grade issue to manifest into a full-blown "acute care syndrome" requiring an expensive E.R. visit or worse yet tertiary in-patient care. Then again, the health plan trains you to believe it is ok to do just that so as long as you call your primary care doctor the next day to say “Hey I went to the E.R. last night and ended up with a triple-CABG” instead of seeing/calling you 5 days ago when the symptoms first started.
So I am not surprised by these data points seen by the authors. Primary care providers need to reclaim their profession from the corporates, their clinical trustworth and passion to provide 1st-line personal and community health care services. We must not negate the growing and important role of mid-levels (PA, NP, Mid-Wife, et. al.) to assuage this dilemna. Mid-level practitioner pipeline should be encouraged nationwide to fill in the regional gaps in 1st-line primary care diagnostics.
Like the forthcoming EMR incentives, primary care physicians should be incentivized to add mid-level practitioners to their practices or communities to enhance their ability to address the millions of minorities, underserved, uninsured, and underinsured patients with lack of access to patient-centered primary care services, and millions of employed and unemployed consumers with sub-acute health issues before they evolve into true acute care concerns.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




