Working Moms Are Happier And Healthier
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Also Included In: Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 14 Dec 2011 - 0:00 PST
'Working Moms Are Happier And Healthier'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
2.55 (40 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.17 (12 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 54 posts |
A report published by The American Psychological Association shows that mothers who maintain their jobs while their children are in infancy and pre-school years are happier and healthier than their more traditional stay at home peers.
Analyzing data starting in 1991 and spanning more than a decade, from the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, lead author Cheryl Buehler, PhD, professor of human development and family studies, at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro clarified that :
"In all cases with significant differences in maternal well-being, such as conflict between work and family or parenting, the comparison favored part-time work over full-time or not working .... However, in many cases the well-being of moms working part time was no different from moms working full time."
The article, published in the December 2011 issue of APA's Journal of Family Psychology, included nearly 1,500 mothers who were interviewed after their child was born and in follow ups over the next 10+ years. Mothers employed part time appeared to have better overall health and less depression than stay at home moms, while general health and depressive symptoms were essentially the same in both full time and part time working mothers.
Interestingly, mothers employed part time had the highest level of sensitivity to their preschool children, spending time and providing opportunities for them to learn and grow. Obviously full-time employment curtailed a certain amount of attention to the children, but part time and stay at home mothers came in equal in terms of their involvement with their children. Perhaps the time away from the children gave the part time working mothers more appreciation of the time they did spend with them.
Part time work is clearly beneficial to the family unit and the study co-author Marion O'Brien, PhD, professor of human development and family studies, also of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, put forward the point that part time employees rarely receive the same benefits as full-time workers, and put forward the case that employers should consider offering similar benefits to part time workers in terms of health insurance, training and career advancement:
"Since part-time work seems to contribute to the strength and well-being of families, it would be beneficial to employers if they provide fringe benefits, at least proportionally, to part-time employees as well as offer them career ladders through training and promotion."
The mothers who were involved with the study included :
- 10 different locations in the US
- Nearly a quarter who were categorized as part of ethnic minorities
- 1 percent with no high school degree
- 14 percent single parents
- On balance 25 percent were part time employed (individual work habits varied but the overall number remained balanced)
- Part-Time work was classified as between one and thirty two hours per week
Actress Jessica Alba said in an interview with María Salas of TerraTV :
"I think [balancing work and family] is something that most women in this country can relate to. It's tough. It's a tough balance, trying to be the best mom. And obviously my family is my priority. And then also, I love what I do, and I love that I get to have a job that I enjoy so much and gives me the freedom to spend a lot of time with my daughter, frankly, and travel and everything else. But it is hard not to spend every second with her."
While another actress Maggie Gyllenhaal said in an interview with Celebrity Baby Scoop :
"Growing up in Los Angeles, I was surrounded by plenty of working moms, including my grandmother, a pediatrician, and my mother, a writer and producer. This seemed very natural to me. I just thought, Well, that's what moms do. They work and raise their kids. I was brought up to believe I could do anything I wanted professionally and, of course, be a mother at the same time ... but I'm finding that it's complicated. It requires a lot of thought and planning, and I haven't figured it out yet."
Obviously women who get back to work after giving birth fit more into their lives and feel the benefit of that. Of course, its a little unfair to make comparisons with millionaire actresses that have flexible schedules, nannies and a team of production staff to help them while they are working, but none-the-less, it seems even with all their advantages, they struggle to get the balance between motherhood and career perfect.
An article in salary.com pegged the compensation for a stay at home mom based on 2007 wage levels at nearly $135,000 per annum. It doesn't always boil down purely to money, but perhaps if stay at home mothers were valued in society this highly, they might find more job satisfaction.
Bill Coleman, senior vice president at Salary.com, said in a statement :
Mom works multiple jobs and rarely gets a break from the action, working an average of 52 hours of overtime."
According to the Salary.com survey, stay-at-home moms work a 92-hour week, with more than half the workweek spent in overtime. You have to wonder how many husbands compensate their baby mama's at that level, even if they can afford it in the first place. Under that kind of pressure, its not surprising they feel happier and healthier handing the kids over to day care and enjoying a more down to earth day job.
Written by Rupert Shepherd
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/239140.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/239140.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
Total 54 opinions, latest 20 shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.Defer to what the child needs
posted by Josephine on 16 Dec 2011 at 1:08 pmNeither way is better, it is a question of which way is better for your individual child. It is a Mom's job to figure out which that is for her child. That is one of the hardest things to decide, and it takes lots of work and introspection to do so. No one should be congratulated or praised just because they stayed at home to be a Mom, or just because they went to work and are a Mom. Neither is an accomplishment in and of itself. The praise is if your choice wound up being a good one for your child and if it truly made a positive inpact on your childs development. I have seen that eiter way CAN be very wonderful. It is all in making the right choice for YOUR child, not every child.
So true
posted by Julie P. on 14 Dec 2011 at 7:04 pmI have read articles like this before. I am a teacher and mom, and as such I feel I have the best of both worlds. I work, enriching the lives of other people's children, then spend afternoons, evenings, and weekends with my husband and kids. I appreciate the time away from my own kids while working. I also have noticed that kids who spend some time outside the home at school (as opposed to homeschooled children) have more confidence because they have problem-solved on their own away from parent influence. We are not religious, so I don't buy into "God says" we should do such-and-such. We are a happy family, and enjoy each other when we are together. I also would NOT want to give up our vacations to stay at home, either!!
Wow:)
posted by Chrismal on 14 Dec 2011 at 9:56 amVery informative article. Working does help you appreciate your children more due to the time spent away. Its healthy. Stay at home moms should join support groups or have some time spent away from their children to focus on themselves alittle each day. It will, in turn, help them cope with everyday stresses that acompany motherhood.
Slavery to a white man?
posted by Lucas on 14 Dec 2011 at 6:31 amNancy wrote: "In my case, I was left with most of the work with the children, the housework, the cooking which basically ended up being slavery to a white man who worked many less hours then I did."
The whole "white man slavery thing" sounded very contrived. If you didn't want to be a stay-at-home mom, then you shouldn't have agreed to have children. Don't blame your husband because one of you had to earn the rent. It's a shame he didn't pitch in when he came home. He certainly should have.
And this study is asinine, but for the past fifty years or so, it's par for the course in our society. Parenting not about how happy the mother should be. Parenting is about raising happy, well adjusted children. The fact that these psychologists are less concerned with how babies and infants are cared for than whether mommy is being fulfilled in her career is pathetic and indicative of our self-indulgent society.
Give them a break!!!
posted by rriiff on 14 Dec 2011 at 6:19 amWe have been raised with the idea that we have to stay home with our children because children are better off. I do agree that children are the joy of life and are a gift that women should cherish. But isn't it a little unfair to criticize working women, even those who do not have to work. please i am not talking about home-stay moms. I am just discussing that women who has rights to have a career life and prove herself to her family and to the community. What i am trying to say is that it depends on both the situation and the person involved. many stay home moms contribute less than working ones just because they resent leaving their job. And many go into depression when the children grow up and realize that they didn't do anything for themselves. I respect that we need to take care of our children but i always ask myself if it is that crucial how come many of the working children raise great children. Women are multitask for a reason and balancing is the key.
Typical sensational journalism
posted by adfw on 14 Dec 2011 at 5:50 amSounds like they picked a title then picked their facts to support it. Typical sensational journalism, if you call it journalism. No job would give me the same joy as watching my babies grow up.
Why Can't It Be True?
posted by Sue on 14 Dec 2011 at 5:42 amReading all the opinion stated has me wondering "Why can't it be true?" Chiming in from the working mother side of the coin. It ires me just a wee bit for anyone to imply that perhaps our child has received the short end of the stick because I have chosen to work outside the home. Not only is he happy and well balanced, but he is also very bright and intelligent as indicated by his 4th grade reading level in the 2nd grade and high IQ ratings. He is gifted in piano and loves to practice and learn after his lessons. He will also tell you that he has THE BEST mom from here to Pluto. And because I work outside the home and have continued my career (and education), our family will continue to be stable (albeit less luxurified) after my husband gets laid off from a 15 year position with what was supposedly a secure job. Oh..and because I also work part time teaching at a local college, my husband's tuition to go back to school after the lay off is completely waived. This has all been made possible by our All Might Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. God has provided for us and in an unstable economy, He has granted us Blessing after Blessing because we have asked Him. And THAT is where true happiness comes from. Why does one have to be better than the other and why can't research have some validity?? Please don't poke those all mighty fingers at moms who work. We love our children just as much as moms who don't work. And our children are just as happy and well balanced. Just sayin'.........
Not sure if God helps
posted by Lisa Camarillo on 14 Dec 2011 at 5:30 amNot sure about the God thing doing any good. I personally know a LOT of solid Christian stay-at-home moms who are on meds for depression and anxiety.
Where?
posted by anonymous on 14 Dec 2011 at 4:31 amWhere exactly in the scriptures does God command women to stay home? I have never seen that scripture.
Not surprising
posted by Doug Piranha on 14 Dec 2011 at 4:13 amLet's see, a woman who finds her career more important than taking care of her family is happier working. Being a full time Mom is frustrating and thankless in the short term, but in the long term....
Maybe a more interesting study would be to study the families and attitudes of women who are retiring from a full time career vs. those that stayed at home with their kids...you know, get the rest of the story...
flawed survey
posted by katie o on 14 Dec 2011 at 4:03 amsounds like a flawed survey. any mom except sociopaths worry so much when they are away from infants that the stress is detrimental. in a world of pedophiles and day care centers in which 1/3 of the employees have criminal records you would have to be totally ignorant to want to leave your child w/ someone all day. i think it has to do w/ the escape factor. if you don't REALLY care for the child it is much easier to leave,waste time at work, and let others care for the child. i still remember how great is was to have my mom in the house when i came in from school and i'm mentally happy unlike alot of my peers it just makes sense
Actresses?
posted by Harry on 14 Dec 2011 at 3:05 amWhy on earth are two actresses providing their "expert" opinion on this? How are they qualitified at all?
Are you kidding?
posted by Jody on 14 Dec 2011 at 1:59 amWith both my hubby and I working full time. & trying to raise two kids ... We constantly (especially me!) feel like a half ass parent and a half ass employee. I work full Time because i HAVE to! It's NOT all its cracked up to be and I have ZERO time for me, which makes me a cranky mom and miserable the majority of the time running in the rat race. I miss my kids and am missing out ...period!
Yes, what about the kids?
posted by Mark on 14 Dec 2011 at 1:59 amWhat about the kids you say? Well, we could also say that would they REALLY be happy being confined to a tight, single home to THE SAME PERSON (their moms) ALL DAY? Evolutionary speaking, we were used to being raised up among tribes and groups with all sorts of different people and by all sorts of extended families. If you ask me, it's more "unnatural" to be confined to a single home being stuck with a single mother. Why would not the kids want to interact with other people, to be raised up by all sorts of different people, and play with the other kids?
So ... what about the kids?
posted by JC on 14 Dec 2011 at 12:46 amFirst, I would think that the health of the mother in situations such as these is just as important as that of the children. I think the idea that mothers have to stop living life once they have children is a mistaken notion that has been used to oppress women historically.
Second, who is to say that the children aren't happier? Has there been a study done that answers this question either way? Do you have any reason to think that the children would be less happy with a working mom than a stay at home mother?
I know that some of the conclusions of this study don't agree with traditional expectations of a mother's role in society, but the study speaks for itself.
If Hollywood says so... LOL!
posted by mrman on 13 Dec 2011 at 11:30 pmQuotes from actresses to buttress their findings.
How about these "study" people stop spending all our tax money, and use some common sense.
Did they factor in how many of the moms in the two groups (stay-at-home vs working) had a choice? If the moms who went back to work WANTED to, but a larger percentage of the stay-at-home moms couldn't find a job that would cover day care expenses and had to stay home against their will, well, gee, maybe the group that was doing what they PREFER would be happier.
And I'm really glad the working moms are happier. How about the husbands and the children? I guess the study doesn't care about them.
Studies like this are always full of holes, and always have an agenda. Beware.
A One Sided Load Of Bull-&
posted by IH on 13 Dec 2011 at 11:24 pmThis news article and supposed research really is a farce.
First of all, "Gold Misses" and their male equivalents report higher levels of unhappiness later on in life with no children and no significant other.
That means that being alone is not the answer.
That is not to say that marriage always increases happiness, rather, marriage creates a balance that gives and takes and thus provides happiness in other ways thus providing a wider variety of happiness and therefore increasing overall happiness. (Although the couple may not necessarily notice it).
That is strongly true when a number of general conditions are kept. For example, good communication between partners, relative economic safety, and other conditions that differ from couple to couple.
So to go straight to the topic at hand. It is wrong to say that working moms are happier than fulltime moms. Perhaps the more correct words would be less stressed. But even that is misleading because when you conduct a survey to assess the stress of being a mother it is obvious that the fulltime mom would have MORE stress than a working mom.
Obviously a working mom give less attention to their children and therefore would be less stressed about raising them. (Escapism)
But to equate that to happiness is WRONG.
First of all, the reasons for a mom working must be analysed. In almost all cases moms work for either of 2 main reasons or both; economic problems, or low support from their husband. With a small minority really working because they love working over raising their children.
It stands to reason that if you work to earn more money to raise your kids or to force your husband to share more household responsibilities that you would also be less stressed by money problems and life in general.
In a sense that would equal to a perceived increase in Happiness. But the article is trying to convince readers that working is good and that you should work.
This certainly sounds as a poor way of justifying one's actions.
All these problems are already very WELL known and documented. It is surprising to see a research that instead of building upon known issues seems to have gone backwards.
To illustrate my point here is a link with a more balanced opinion.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700141961/Study-Working-moms-happiness-depends-on-husbands-quality-of-work.html
And How About The Children
posted by DanteMX on 13 Dec 2011 at 11:12 pm...That is my only concern within the paradigm of this study.
Dig Deeper
posted by Anthony on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:55 pmThis study reminds me of a Harvard research effort that supposedly demonstrated how people without children are generally happier than those with children. How you can assess happiness by the responses of people with completely different lifestyles and priorities is beyond me but these researchers seem to feel their work is credible. Regarding this piece of research, I like many other readers question what the price of this happiness (for working mothers) amounts to in terms of the effects on the children. While I am not a psychology researcher, it seems logical to me that parents, yes both mothers and fathers, spend as much time as possible with their offspring especially during the early years of life. To my understanding, we are the only species that give up the care of our offspring to others (i.e. daycare) so even from the most simplistic, neanderthalic perspective, leaving your child for 50-plus hours a week (in many cases) seems unnatural. Are breaks from child rearing responsibilities healthy? Resoundingly YES!!! But is leaving your child's welfare to the care of another person for extensive periods of time? Not in my book, even if it makes a mother or father "happier" whatever that means. I appreciate how the author implies in his closing statement that dropping the kids off at daycare is easier than slogging it out at home. Sometimes are hardest job is the most rewarding, particularly when the stakes are so high (your own child). Bottom line is I think the researchers should tell the full story and not short change the reader.
More hog-wash!!!
posted by Beez on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:42 pmOkay so I don't know where you did your study but I find that stay-at-home mothers and wives feel fulfilled in their lives. I know the children feel more loved and cared for. Of course, our society does all it can to remove us and isolate us from our families because citizens who feel safe and loved are very difficult to control through fear. Our education system stinks. Our environment is toxic and unsafe and yet this "study" claims that women are happier when they are away from their children. It's Hogwash!
Latest 20 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Working Moms Are Happier And Healthier'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





