Sex Abstinence Programs A Waste Of Time And Money, Study
Featured ArticleMain Category: Sexual Health / STDs
Also Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 14 Apr 2007 - 20:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.63 (51 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.17 (18 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Children who took part in sex abstinence classes were found to be just as likely to engage in sexual intercourse for the first time at the same age as children who did not receive these classes, say researchers from Mathematica Policy Research Inc, in a study the US Congress had ordered. According to this latest research, teenagers first had sex at the age of 14.9 years, regardless of whether they attended sex abstinence classes.
Abstinence programs encourage children to refrain from sexual intercourse before marriage. Despite critics saying these programs are a waste of money - money which could be directed in other more effective programs - the US federal government spends $176 million on them annually.
The Bush administration seems to be saying that further abstinence programs are needed, rather than accepting the failure.
Harry Wilson, Commissioner, Family and Youth Services Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, said the report confirms that these interventions are not like vaccines and that people should not expect one dose in middle school, or a small dose, to be protective all throughout the youth's high school career.
In this latest study researchers examined four abstinence programs throughout the USA. The students who attended these programs were compared with others, in the same areas, who did not attend the programs - a total of 2,057 children. Those who did take part in the programs did so for 1 to 3 years, aged 11 to 12. The programs started in 1999. They were followed up in 2005/2006, by which time most of the participants, and the controls, were aged 16 and-a-half years. In both groups (those who attended the program and those who didn't) the number of children who had not engaged in sexual intercourse was identical - about half of them.
Even though the researchers found the programs had no effect on childrens' sexual habits later on, they stressed that the programs did not result in an increase in the rate of unprotected sex. Critics have suggested that the sex abstinence programs could result in children engaging in unprotected sex in larger numbers.
Many believe the $176 million could be better used in sponsoring comprehensive sex education - these would include abstinence, among other things.
The USA has one of the highest rates of unwanted teenage pregnancies in the Western World.
"Impacts of Four Title V, Section 510 Abstinence Education Programs,"
Christopher Trenholm, Barbara Devaney, Ken Forston, Lisa Quay, Justin Wheeler, and Melissa Clark
Mathematica Policy Research Inc.
Click here to see study online (pdf)
Written by: Christian Nordqvist
Editor: Medical News Today
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/67798.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/67798.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Beware Of Sweeping Conclusions
posted by Chuck Cardiff on 15 Apr 2007 at 6:17 amBefore drawing sweeping conclusions, people should note that the education programs studied targeted children at surprisingly young ages (some as early as third grade), years before the children became sexually active, and years before the children would have any real understanding of what was being taught.
The real question is why anyone would be foolish enough to expect results from such a bizarre strategy. As the final report states, "Findings from this study provide no evidence that abstinence programs implemented in
upper elementary and middle schools are effective at reducing the rate of teen sexual activity several years later.
However, the findings provide no information on the effects programs might have if they were implemented for high school youth or began at earlier ages but served youth through high school."
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




