Medicare Will Not Pay For Hospital Mistakes And Infections, New Rule
Featured ArticleMain Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP
Also Included In: Seniors / Aging; MRSA / Drug Resistance
Article Date: 20 Aug 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.86 (28 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.22 (27 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
Starting in 2009, Medicare, the US government's health insurance program for elderly and disabled Americans, will not cover the costs of "preventable" conditions, mistakes and infections resulting from a hospital stay.
So for instance, if you are on Medicare and you pick up a hospital acquired infection while you are being treated for something that is covered by Medicare, the extra cost of treating the hospital acquired infection will no longer be paid for by Medicare. Instead, the bill will be picked up by the hospital itself since the rules don't allow the hospital to charge it to you.
According to a statement from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the new rule is part of a step to:
"Improve the accuracy of Medicare's payment under the acute care hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS), while providing additional incentives for hospitals to engage in quality improvement efforts."
That means Medicare won't be paying for surgery to remove objects accidentally left inside the patient in an operation, and neither will it pay for treating patients who receive the wrong blood type in a transfusion. But the main impact will be in the area of hospital acquired infections.
Hospital acquired infections kill nearly 100,000 Americans a year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with 2 million patients needing treatment that costs over 25 billion dollars a year.
Consumer groups say the changes will give hospitals a strong incentive to prevent such mistakes and thereby increase patients safety from infections and procedural errors.
Lisa McGiffert, director of Consumers Union's Stop Hospital Infections campaign welcomed the news:
"Every year, millions of Americans suffer needlessly from preventable hospital infections and medical errors."
"These new rules are a good beginning for Medicare to use its clout to mobilize hospitals to improve care and keep patients safe," she added.
According to the Consumers Union, at the moment, more than 60 per cent of the total national bill for treating hospital acquired infections is met by Medicare. And many of these infections could be prevented if hospitals followed simple infection control procedures such as making sure hospital staff washed their hands between patients.
The CMS said the new rules are possible because of provisions in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA). Already incorporated in many state health care programs, under the DRA hospitals have to start reporting on secondary diagnoses from 1st October this year. Starting in financial year 2009, Medicare will not pay the treatment costs for these secondary diagnoses unless they were present on admission.
The conditions that will no longer be covered by Medicare include mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, bed sores, air embolism, falls, leaving objects inside the patient during sugery, vascular catheter-associated infections and certain catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
The new rules also expand the list of publicly reported quality measures and reduce Medicare's payment for devices that hospitals replace at reduced or no cost to themselves.
CMS said that the new rules will not only improve the quality of care for Medicare benificiaries, but will save millions of taxpayer dollars every year. The total Medicare bill is currently over 400 billion dollars a year and is expected to rise as the baby boomers reach their middle 60s.
CMS Acting Deputy Administrator Herb Kuhn said the new rules are part of a strategy toward becoming "a more active purchaser of high quality care for Medicare beneficiaries."
Click here for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Click here for Medicare site.
Written by: Catharine Paddock
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/80074.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/80074.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
It's A Money Issue Not Quality
posted by Beaugas on 20 Aug 2007 at 3:14 amEveryone must understand that complications such as infections can occur and not infrequently occur even when everything is done perfectly. It may have more to do with the patient's ability to fight infection than the circumstances in the hospital. Sick people and the elderly don't have perfect immune function and tend to be more likely to get infection, even if perfect sterile technique and antibiotics are used. To now say the hospital must pay for it is another crock. If there is clear culpability, fine but most of the time there isn't. Who's doing the deciding? Some desk jockey at the government shouldn't be the one. We are destroying the hospitals by pulling out the money. Guess who will then foot the bill. All the rest of us who have insurance. The costs must be passed on it the hospitals are to stay in business. Follow the money.
I acquired CDIF after operation
posted by kaye ponton on 2 Sep 2011 at 5:49 pmFound site by accident. Article was very informative and will be helpfhelpful for me. I acquired CDIF after operation Jan 2011. It is now Sept 2011 & I am still fighting imfection. It has not only been hard physically but financially. Loss of income & hugh prescription costs Perhaps the hospital will help me with these expenses. Prior to this I knew nothing about these infections. If only hospital staff & doctors would simply wash their hands & wipe down hard surfaces with clorex! Thanks for letting me vent
I am sorry that happened to you
posted by A Saleh on 23 Sep 2011 at 5:19 amI am so glad that Medicare took this measure. I am a RN and I know that hospitals are very dangerous place for one to be. So, something had to be done to change that and make hospitals safe. Since people have a tendency to only stop bad behaviors when money loss is involved this measure will give an incentive for appropriate changes to be implemented. By the way,did you know that some Hospitals are encouraging patients to ask health providers if they washed their hands? Shame on us...I hope you get well soon.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





