Massive Gun "Buyback" Doubled Fall In Australian Gun Deaths
Main Category: Public HealthArticle Date: 18 Dec 2006 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.33 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1.8 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The chances of gun death in Australia dropped twice as steeply after 700,000 guns were destroyed in a national firearm "buyback" and amnesty, reveals a decade long study in Injury Prevention.
The study tracks the 10 years following the introduction of gun law reform in Australia between 1996 and 1998.
The legislation was prompted by a firearm massacre in Tasmania in 1996, when 35 people were killed and a further 18 seriously wounded.
The reforms banned the use of semi automatic and pump action shotguns and rifles, destroying more than 700,000 weapons taken from a population of 12 million adults.
The study shows that in the 18 years before the legislation was passed, there were 13 mass shootings in Australia, in which 112 people died and 52 were wounded.
There have been no mass shootings since the law came into force.
The fall in the number of deaths associated with the use of firearms, including suicides, rapidly accelerated after the law took effect.
The decline was at least twice as high (6%) as it had been before the reforms were introduced.
In the 18 years prior to the legislation, on average, 491 people took their lives, using a firearm. After the legislation, this fell to an average of 246.
Similarly, the number of murders using guns fell from an annual average of 93 to just over 55.
There was no evidence that the use of other methods to commit suicide or homicide increased.
Before the introduction of the law, the overall number of homicides not related to guns had increased 1% a year. After the law took effect, this number fell by almost 2.5% a year.
And the total numbers of suicides fell by 4% after having risen annually by 2% before the introduction of the gun laws.
British Medical Journal
BMA House, Tavistock Sq
London WC1H 9JP
United Kingdom
http://www.bmj.com
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/59264.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/59264.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Clarification Of Key Facts
posted by Brendan on 18 Dec 2006 at 1:45 amUnfortunately, the article fails to mention that the statistics contained within the study show that the pre existing decline in firearm homicide in Australia was not altered by the gun buyback.
It is quite misleading to claim otherwise, given that Table 3 in the paper shows very clearly that there was no significant change in the rate of decline for homicides, with or without mass shootings included.
The research also shows that suicides by firearm and suicides using other methods both started to decline more rapidly post-1996, suggesting that factors other than the gun laws were having a general effect.
I was very disappointed that this was not acknowledged or commented on by the authors of the study - it seems like an absolutely vital point in light of most firearm deaths in Australia being suicides (as the data in the study show).
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






