Vaccinated Children Two And A Half Times More Likely To Have Neurological Disorders Like ADHD And Autism, New Survey In California And Oregon Finds
Main Category: Immune System / VaccinesAlso Included In: Neurology / Neuroscience; Autism; ADHD
Article Date: 27 Jun 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.58 (113 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.12 (50 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 23 posts |
As the first trial in Vaccine Court explores the relationship between vaccines and autism, a new survey released today indicates a strong correlation between rates of neurological disorders, such as ADHD and autism, and childhood vaccinations.
The survey, commissioned by Generation Rescue, compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children in nine counties in Oregon and California. Among more than 9,000 boys age 4-17, the survey found vaccinated boys were two and a half times (155%) more likely to have neurological disorders compared to their unvaccinated peers. Vaccinated boys were 224% more likely to have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and 61% more likely to have autism.
For older vaccinated boys in the 11-17 age bracket, the results were even more pronounced. Vaccinated boys were 158% more likely to have a neurological disorder, 317% more likely to have ADHD, and 112% more likely to have autism. Complete survey results are available at http://www.GenerationRescue.org.
Generation Rescue commissioned the phone survey. Data was gathered by SurveyUSA, a national market research firm, which surveyed parents by phone on more than 17,000 children, ages 4-17, in five counties in California (San Diego, Sonoma, Orange, Sacramento, and Marin) and four counties in Oregon (Multnomah, Marion, Jackson, and Lane).
The survey asked parents whether their child had been vaccinated, and whether that child had one or more of the following diagnoses: Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), ADHD, Asperger's Syndrome, Pervasive Development Disorder -- Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS), or Autism. The phone survey was chosen to mirror the methodology the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) uses to establish national prevalence for neurological disorders in their national phone survey.
Timed to the release of the survey results, Generation Rescue also ran full-page advertisements in Washington's Roll Call, The Oregonian, and The Orange County Register today. The ad compares the 36 pediatric vaccines the CDC recommends today to the 10 recommended in 1983, and asks, "Are We Over- Vaccinating Our Kids?"
"No one has ever compared prevalence rates of these neurological disorders between vaccinated and unvaccinated children," said J.B. Handley, co-founder of Generation Rescue, whose son was diagnosed with autism. "The phone survey isn't perfect, but these numbers point to the need for a comprehensive national study to gather this critical information."
In Washington, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) has been advocating for such a survey. Co-sponsored by Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) and Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), the "Comprehensive Comparative Study of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Population Act of 2006," or H.R. 2832, was introduced on June 22, and would require the National Institutes of Health to complete this research.
"Generation Rescue's study is impressive and forcefully raises some serious questions about the relationship between vaccines and autism. What is ultimately needed to resolve this issue one way or the other is a comprehensive national study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children," said Congresswoman Maloney. "The parents behind Generation Rescue only want information. These parents deserve more than road blocks, they deserve answers. We can and should move forward in search of those answers. That's why I've introduced a common sense bill that would require the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct a comprehensive, comparative study on the possible link between autism and thimerosal."
From 1983 to 2007, autism rates have climbed from 1 in 10,000 children to 1 in 150 children, a growth rate of 6,000% (boys are significantly more affected by neurological disorders, accounting for approximately 80% of all cases). ADHD currently affects 1 in 13 children. In the same period, the CDC's recommended vaccine schedule more than tripled. The simmering debate over the cause of childhood neurological disorders shows no sign of cooling, but no study had ever been done to look at unvaccinated children.
Lisa Handley, co-founder of Generation Rescue, adds, "Everyone working with autism wants to identify the cause so we can focus on treatment and prevention. A national study like HR 5940 could help end this debate and focus all of our resources on helping our kids. Its time has come, and we hope Congress will choose to put our children first."
About Generation Rescue
Generation Rescue was formed by parents of children who have been diagnosed with childhood neurological disorders (NDs), and is dedicated to examining the causes and biomedical treatments for Autism, Asperger's, ADHD, ADD, PDD-NOS, and other learning disabilities. Visit http://www.GenerationRescue.org for more information and to see complete survey results.
Generation Rescue
http://www.GenerationRescue.org
Visit our immune system / vaccines section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/75333.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/75333.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (23)
Vaccination
posted by Michael Nightingale on 3 Jul 2007 at 2:10 amData on the adverse effects of vaccination have always been ignored and/or suppressed. Like the Athenasean Creed it may not be questioned.
Perhaps, at last, a new approach to vaccination will be possible
More junk science
posted by Good grief on 9 Nov 2010 at 10:43 pmThe anti-vax group would gain a lot more credibility if they stopped doing faulty research and then making lofty claims based on the results.
There is very clearly two different groups in this study - those who trust the medical professionals, and those who don't. It takes a certain kind of parent to chose not to vaccinate, and they are very likely to be the same kind of parent who either won't seek assessment for such things as ADHD, or rejects the findings of the doctors because it is an 'over-diagnosed condition.'
The only way to get a meaningful results would be to look at the kids who have been assessed and diagnosed, and look at the vaccination records among them. That, or conduct assessments of the children who were not vaccinated, and get an accurate reflection of what their diagnosis is (not parent self-reports), and the compare the numbers across vaccinated and non-vaccinated kids.
Scientists are highly trained to create and conduct the best research possible, free of bias and flaws (in this case, a sampling flaw). The mere fact that the anit-vax studies are NOT being conducted in such a way leads me to believe that either:
A)these particular scientists are carefully conducting biased studies or
B) these particular scientists don't know the difference.
Neither of which bodes well.
Please, remove your emotional reaction, and look critically at everything.
Don't be Ignorant - This was a Survey
posted by Good Grief to Good Grief on 10 Nov 2010 at 1:12 pmI would like to respond to Good Griefs' comments. First, this article is based on a survey, not a research project. Those so called "lofty claims" are merely the results of this survey.
Vaccine facts not opinions.
posted by Daren Joseph on 10 Nov 2010 at 1:24 pmThe scientific evidence clearly indicates that vaccinations never provided immunity for any childhood diseases. The main advances in combating disease over 200 years have been attributed only to better food, clean drinking water and better sanitation. Here's an informative link based on medical statistics conducted over the past 200 years.
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fchildhealthsafety.wordpress.com%2Fgraphs%2F&h=91ead
facts
posted by George Jones on 10 Nov 2010 at 2:04 pmEeerrrmmm, how are scientists unbiased when they're on big-pharma payrolls ? This is easy enough to check. The majority of studies saying vaccines don't cause autism are paid for by the vaccine industry.
Get your own facts straight.
why more boys?
posted by Anne on 10 Nov 2010 at 6:33 pmI am a trained epidemiologist. If boys and girls have the same vaccination rates...why do boys account for 80% of all neurological disorder cases as stated?
I agree that comparing vaccinated children with not vaccinated children is difficult. There are many many differences between children whose parents do not vaccinate. You would have to control for all of these factors in your model, which data would need to be carefully collected. Also, there are no confidence intervals listed for the RR 's in the telephone survey.
why more boys
posted by jespren on 11 Nov 2010 at 5:07 amIn answer to a previous query about why more boys, boys brains develop at a different rate and order than females, which makes them more likely to have neurological issues when effected during late neonatal development and early childhood.
Yes! More boys than girls
posted by Ann on 11 Nov 2010 at 10:16 amBoys DO have a higher rate of autism - this has been known for many years. Perhaps it hormonal? Estrogen protects, testosterone doesn't? Check out the latest research.
To vaccinate or not to vaccinate...
posted by Teresa Allen on 11 Nov 2010 at 10:24 pmJust because some of us choose not to vaccinate does not mean that when our child needs medical attention we don't take them to the doctor! Good grief!
The choice to not vaccinate comes from educating ourselves on the toxic and dangerous chemicals that are IN vaccines. The only way to make an informed decision is to research and educate ourselves with everything we can.
I used to be on the other side of the fence. I had no idea what vaccines did in the body or what was even IN the vaccines. I trusted my kids' doctors and was a "good little patient". It was only after my 16 year old daughter was injured from the Gardasil vaccine that I began researching vaccines and the horrible ingredients in them. What I found was shocking and heartbreaking.
There are so many parents in the same situation that I have found myself in. Once your child is vaccine injured its almost impossible to find any help from the medical community! The doctors turn their backs on us and flat out refuse to believe that our child was injured from a vaccine. We are left with having to nurse our sick and injured child alone...trying to find something to help our child feel and get better. Sometimes the child dies and we have no recourse...the vaccine manufacturers are immune from lawsuits. Once the child is vaccine injured, we as parents are left with unbelievable guilt for not doing our own research.
My daughter was a healthy, happy and active teenager before 2 rounds of Gardasil. She was an A B student and was rarely sick. Now she is sick almost every day. She cannot attend school. She has SO many health problems now and the doctors and hospitals are no help.
VAERS has over 20,000 reports of adverse events and 84 deaths associated with Gardasil. This is estimated to be only 1 to 10 percent of the true numbers. http://www.truthaboutgardasil.org
If vaccines work then our unvaccinated children should be no threat to vaccinated children. I'm constantly reading where unvaccinated are a health threat to the vaccinated. But the opposite is actually true. When someone is vaccinated with let's say the h1n1 or whooping cough vaccines, they shed the virus for up to 21 days. This makes them contageous! If they come in contact with an unvaccinated child, that child could be infected!
Please just do your own research into vaccines and their ingredients. Then research those toxic chemicals and decide for yourself...do you really want those poisons injected into your child?
This evidence should generate a properly funded government survey
posted by Jenny Allan on 11 Nov 2010 at 10:59 pmThe comments of 'Good Grief' and 'Anne' are all too predictable and frankly they make me sick!! Here we go again; these estsblishment apologists trot out those same old allegations of 'junk science' and badly designed surveys which would NEVER be good enough for 'properly trained' scientists and epidemiologists. How foolish for members of the public to listen to a bunch of rank amateurs!!
I am a 'trained scientist', including statistical analysis, a pensioner in my sixties and a trained teacher and I would like to stick each of these patronizing so called 'scientists', on their own, into a class of 30+ schoolchildren with even ONE autistic or ADHT child to contend with. The last class I had contact with had one such child. The education authority took on a child psychologist and care assistant just for HIM!! Fortunately I am now retired!!
There were NO such children when I was at school in the 1950s.
The recent explosion in autistic spectrum and attention deficit disorders is just CRYING OUT for some proper government funded research into the reasons for this. No one knows why boys are affected more than girls, but we MUST find out and SOON. WE can then find out how to STOP this holocaust from continuing.
'Real scientists', what are you waiting for??
First 10 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




