In Transplants, Older Livers Not So Different Than Younger Ones
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Transplants / Organ Donations
Also Included In: Liver Disease / Hepatitis
Article Date: 22 Jul 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.5 (2 votes) |
Patients with the hepatitis C virus who receive a liver from a donor older than age 60 do not experience a higher rate of transplant failure, death, or recurrent disease in the following five years, according to a study published in the July issue of Archives of Surgery.
The most common reason for liver transplants among adults in the United States is cirrhosis of the liver caused by the hepatitis C viral infection. Though hospitals have been expanding requirements for donors to increase the number of eligible organs, about 17,000 patients remain on the waiting list for a liver transplant. One criteria change has been increasing donor age limits. "There are concerning reports, however, in recipients with hepatitis C virus that extended criteria donors, particularly older donors, are associated with poorer outcome, especially with early and severe hepatitis C virus recurrence in the donor graft," note the authors.
To analyze the outcomes of liver transplants from donors of various ages, M.B. Majella Doyle, M.D. (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis) and colleagues used data from 489 adult liver transplants performed between 1997 and 2006. Some of the patients needed a liver transplant due to hepatitis C (187 of 489 or 38.2%), while others presented a different indication for transplant (302 of 489 or 61.8%).
Survival rates for patients with the hepatitis C virus were: 88.1% after one year, 78.3% after three years, and 69.2% after five years. In this group of hepatitis C virus-positive recipients, 85.6% of donor livers were still functioning after one year, 75.6% after three years, and 65.6% after five years. Among patients with and without hepatitis C, the researchers did not find significant differences in rates of survival and graft survival at one, three, or five years. The authors caution, however, that, "Similar to other long-term transplant centers, we observed a negative effect from recurrent hepatitis C virus with a trend toward worsened long-term survival between years five and 10."
Livers from donors who were age 60 and older were transplanted into 72 patients - 24 (12.8%) with hepatitis C virus and 48 (15.9%) without the virus. Patient and graft survival rates at one, three, and five years for patients who received livers from donors age 60 and older were not significantly different than survival rates for patients who received organs from younger donors. The researchers also found no difference in survival rates if the donor was age 65 or older. These results suggest that the practice of using livers from older donors is safe, according to the authors.
The researchers conclude that, "Overall patient and graft survival in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients is comparable with that in hepatitis C virus-negative patients, and there seems to be little, if any, adverse effect on short- and medium-term follow-up with the use of carefully selected older donor grafts in recipients with hepatitis C virus...Data from this series suggest that the continued use of selected older donors is a safe method of expanding the liver donor pool, even for hepatitis C-positive recipients."
Liver Transplant for Hepatitis C Virus: Effect of Using Older Donor Grafts on Short- and Medium-Term Survival
M. B. Majella Doyle; Christopher D. Anderson; Neeta Vachharajani; Jeffrey A. Lowell; Surendra Shenoy; Mauricio Lisker-Melman; Kevin Korenblat; Jeffrey S. Crippin; William C. Chapman
Archives of Surgery (2008). 143[7]: pp. 679 - 685.
Click Here to View Abstract
Written by: Peter M Crosta
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/115669.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/115669.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




