Vegetarians Have Fewer Cancers But Higher Risk Of Colorectal Cancer, Study
Featured ArticleMain Category: Nutrition / Diet
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology; Colorectal Cancer
Article Date: 16 Mar 2009 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.73 (11 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.75 (4 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 4 posts |
UK researchers found that vegetarians had a lower overall cancer rate than meat eaters, but contrary to suggestions from other studies, they found a higher rate of colorectal cancer among the vegetarians than among the meat eaters.
The study was the work of researchers working on the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Oxford (EPIC-Oxford) and the findings were published in the online issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition on 11 March.
In their background information, lead author Tim Key, a Cancer Research UK epidemiologist who is based at the University of Oxford, and colleagues wrote that few prospective studies (where groups of people are followed over a period of time) have looked at cancer rates among vegetarians, although the "5 a day" recommendation is geared to lowering risk of cancers and other diseases, so they decided to look at overall and individual cancer incidence rates among vegetarians and non-vegetarians.
For the study they examined EPIC data on 63,550 men and women aged 20 to 89 recruited throughout the UK during the 1990s. They got the cancer incidence figures from national cancer registries.
The results showed that:
- The standardized incidence ratio for all cancers for all participants was 72 per cent (that is lower than the overall population).
- Compared with meat eaters in the cohort, and after adjusting for age, sex and smoking status, the vegetarians in the cohort showed an 11 per cent lower incidence rate of all cancers.
- However, for colorectal cancer, vegetarians showed a 39 per cent higher incidence rate compared with meat eaters.
"The overall cancer incidence rates of both the vegetarians and the nonvegetarians in this study are low compared with national rates."
"Within the study, the incidence of all cancers combined was lower among vegetarians than among meat eaters, but the incidence of colorectal cancer was higher in vegetarians than in meat eaters," they added.
The researchers said their findings pointed to the need for more research in this area, especially given the rather surprising finding about higher colorectal cancer rates among the non meat eaters.
Red meat has been associated with higher rates of colorectal cancer.
Key told the press that the results were interesting and suggest there "might be some reduction in cancers in vegetarians and fish-eaters and we need to look carefully at that," according to a BBC report.
Key said there was a need to look more carefully at how meat fits in, because their findings didn't support the view that vegetarians ought to have lower rates of colorectal cancer.
He explained that it was very difficult to do studies on the links between diet and cancer.
It is possible that the people in this study were not necessarily representative of the population as a whole (as suggested by the first finding), for instance most of them were eating only moderate amounts of meat every day, and most of them were only just meeting the daily recommendation of 5 portions of fruit and vegetables a day, a leading nutritionist commented to the BBC.
"Cancer incidence in vegetarians: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC- Oxford)."
Timothy J Key, Paul N Appleby, Elizabeth A Spencer, Ruth C Travis, Andrew W Roddam, and Naomi E Allen.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, first published online March 11, 2009.
doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736M
Click here for Abstract.
Sources: Journal abstract, University of Chicago Medical Center, BBC.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/142427.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/142427.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (4)
These Findings Do Not Stack Up
posted by Ania Sagajllo on 19 Mar 2009 at 6:16 amHaving read the excellent book The China Study by Drs Campbell & Campbell, it refers to independent studies carried out over two decades. These found that a high protein meat-based diet caused higher rates of cancer including colorectal cancer.
The definition of a "vegetarian" diet does not necessarily mean a healthy diet. Some vegetarians consider a cheese pizza as a vegetarian meal! Chocolate cake is often seen as "vegetarian". It is possible to do extensive studies about the link between diet and cancer but no-one is prepared to get the funding to do this over a long period of time as has been detailed in The China Study book. A healthy "vegetarian" diet is one of eating all organic whole grains, whole beans, fresh vegetables and fruits, without the need for dairy, sugars, processed foods, animal based foods and refined fats and other chemicals and preservatives. "Vegetarian" is not necessarily healthy as the definition in this article is not clarified.
Ania Sagajllo
Did those vegetarians drink alcohol regulary?
posted by Anya Jones on 25 Feb 2011 at 1:58 amI have to agree with the first comment: not all vegetarian diets are healthy. Many vegetarians eat a lot of dairy products and consume alcohol regularly, not to mention the amount of sugar and salt intake. Also, they might not have been vegetarians for long. It is surprising the researchers did not take alcohol and dairy products into account (or did not mention in the report).
Let's look a little closer...
posted by Johnsonb on 28 Mar 2011 at 10:08 amI would have a hard time believing the results of a study like this since there is a huge difference in eating processed foods compared to whole foods whether you are vegetarian or a meat-eater. One who eats more meats may have a higher risk of cancer just because there is so many chemicals in processed meats, for example, sodium nitrate. I'm not trying to knock vegetarianism I tried it and I got pretty sick after 8 months then I switched to the following diet and improved a lot. Then again I have IBD so maybe that's why.
okay
posted by f on 24 Aug 2011 at 12:44 pmeven if vegetarians eat dairy, fats, etc, the study should still find lower colorectal cancer rate, than the meat eating group, given that both groups eat similar amounts of dairy, fats, etc and that dairy, fats etc are not more carcinogenic as a part of a vegeterian diet, than as a part of a meat eating diet
but, the environment pollutants that pass to vegetables, may explain the higher incidence of cancer in the vegan group
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






