ADHD Could Be Misdiagnosed In Nearly 1 Million US Kids Say Researchers
Featured ArticleMain Category: ADHD
Also Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health; Public Health; Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 18 Aug 2010 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (13 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.13 (8 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 6 posts |
Two studies published recently suggest there could be something wrong with the way ADHD is diagnosed in young children in the US, one found that nearly 1 million kids are potentially misdiagnosed just because they are the youngest in their kindergarten year, with the youngest in class twice as likely to be on stimulant medication, while the other study confirmed that whether children were born just before or just after the kindergarten cutoff date significantly affected their chances of being diagnosed with ADHD.
Papers on both studies by US researchers are in press, to be published in the Journal of Health Economics, the first being a corrected proof that was first available online in June, and the other appeared online on 4 August.
In the first paper, Dr Todd Elder, assistant professor of economics at Michigan State University, looked at a sample of nearly 12,000 children from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Cohort, which is funded by the National Center for Education Statistics. He analysed the difference in ADHD diagnosis and medication rates between the youngest and the oldest children in a kindergarten grade.
He found that the youngest children were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD and to be prescribed behavior-modifying stimulants such as Ritalin than their older classmates. He told the press that the "smoking gun" was that the diagnoses depended on the children's age relative to classmates and the teacher's perceptions of whether they had symptoms.
Elder said:
"If a child is behaving poorly, if he's inattentive, if he can't sit still, it may simply be because he's 5 and the other kids are 6."
"There's a big difference between a 5-year-old and a 6-year-old, and teachers and medical practitioners need to take that into account when evaluating whether children have ADHD," he urged.
Elder said medicating such children inappropriately was a cause for concern not just because of the effect of long term stimulant use on their health but also because it costs a lot of money: he estimated about 320 to 500 million US dollars is being wasted on unnecessary medication of young children for ADHD, of which 80 to 90 million is funded by Medicaid.
From his analysis, Elder found that the youngest kindergarten kids were 60 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than the oldest in the same grade, and also, by the time those groups reached the fifth and eighth grades, the youngest were more than twice as likely to be on prescription stimulants.
Elder estimated that overall in the US, the misdiagnosis rate is about 1 in 5, that is around 900,000 of the 4.5 million children currently diagnosed with ADHD have been misdiagnosed.
He found the same definitive pattern both in the case of individual states and when he compared across states.
Michigan for example has a cutoff date of 1st December for kindergarten attendance. Elder found higher rates of diagnosed ADHD among Michigan kids born on 1st December than born on 2nd December. Those born on the 1st December would have been the youngest in their grade, while those born on the 2nd, just one day later, because of the cutoff date, would have enrolled a year later and therefore been among the oldest in their grade.
Elder remarked that even though these kids were only born a day apart, they were assessed differently because they were being compared with classmates of a different age set.
Looking across states, Elder gave the example of Illinois and Michigan. In Illinois, where the cutoff date for kindergarten is 1st September, August-born kids were more likely to have been diagnosed with ADHD than Michigan kids born in August of the same year.
Elder's study defined a diagnosis of ADHD as including evidence of multiple symptoms, including inattention and hyperactivity sustained for six months or more observed in two settings, for instance the home and school, before the age of seven.
Although a mental health professional performs the diagnosis, the opinions of teachers often influence whether a child is sent for evaluation in the first place, said Elder.
"Many ADHD diagnoses may be driven by teachers' perceptions of poor behavior among the youngest children in a kindergarten classroom," said Elder, but the "symptoms" that teachers perceive may "merely reflect emotional or intellectual immaturity among the youngest students".
ADHD is the most commonly diagnosed behavioral disorder for kids in the United States, and currently there are no neurological markers for ADHD (such as a blood test for example). Experts disagree on how common it is, hotting up public debate about whether it is under- or over-diagnosed, said Elder.
In the second paper, researchers at North Carolina (NC) State University, Notre Dame and the University of Minnesota drew very similar conclusions to those of Elder's study.
Co-author Dr Melinda Morrill, a research assistant professor of economics at NC State, told the press that:
"The question we asked was whether children who are relatively young compared to their classroom peers were more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD."
Morrill and colleagues looked at kids born just before the kindergarten eligibility cutoff date and those born shortly after and found large discrepancies in rates of ADHD diagnosis and treatment based on small differences in birth dates.
For the study they analyzed data from two national health surveys and a national database of private health insurance claims. The data covered several periods between 1996 and 2006.
They found that kids who were "relatively old-for-grade", that is those born just after the kindergarten cutoff date, were 25 per cent less likely to have received a diagnosis for ADHD than their the "relatively young-for-grade" peers, that is kids born just before the cutoff date.
As their premise was that children born a few days apart should have the same underlying risk of developing ADHD, finding a significant discrepancy based on small differences in age suggests the problem is inappropriate diagnosis, concluded the researchers.
"This indicates that there are children who are diagnosed (or not) because of something other than underlying biological or medical reasons," said Morrill.
"We believe that younger children may be mistakenly diagnosed as having ADHD, when in fact they are simply less mature," she added, drawing the same conclusion as Elder in the first study.
However, she wished to stress that their study is "not downplaying the existence or significance of ADHD in children".
"What our research shows is that similar students have significantly different diagnosis rates depending on when their birthday falls in relation to the school year," she pointed out.
"The importance of relative standards in ADHD diagnoses: Evidence based on exact birth dates."
Todd E. Elder
Journal of Health Economics, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 17 June 2010
DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.003
"Measuring Inappropriate Medical Diagnosis and Treatment in Survey Data: The Case of ADHD among School-Age Children."
William N. Evans, Melinda S. Morrill, Stephen T. Parente
Journal of Health Economics, In Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available online 4 August 2010.
DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.07.005
-- Journal of Health Economics
Sources: Michigan State University, North Carolina State University.
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/198077.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/198077.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (6)
Could the underlying possiblity of money be the problem
posted by Ginger on 18 Aug 2010 at 4:58 amI run a business where I come in contact with many people. I also am in a position to hear a lot about their personal lives that perhaps shouldn't be shared as well.
One thing that I have noticed a huge increase in over the past 2 years is the diagnosis of children with one ailment or another ranging from ADHD to Autism. (always mild Autism in these cases, something hard to dispute to the average eye) Then I always find out that this now qualifies the said child for benefits. One of which is a monthly check due to said ailment.
I KNOW there are many legitimate cases out there, but for every legit one, I am willing to be that there are 5 "bogus" diagnosis' due to money for the doctor and for the family of the "patient" as well.
I want to tell these people, don't label your child for a small check each month. You are going to limit them and their possible chances by doing so. Often the parent has a crutch now on which to lean/blame all behavior problems and an easy out for the kid anytime a situation simply get to "hard" and they don't want to even try. Soon we will have a generation of folks who NEVER gave anything their best shot.
doctors need to be held accountable
posted by Lynn Tulumello on 18 Aug 2010 at 6:55 amI think it's about time that doctors be held accountable for their diagnosis and especially their 'wrong' diagnosis. The bar for sueing them needs to be lowered so that when they make these willy nilly wrong diagnosis their is actually going to be a financial penalty attached to it. And there should be because it's no small matter to be putting a child on DRUGS.. YES DRUGS for no reason. Maybe doctors should be charged with 'endangering the welfare of a child' when they put kids on drugs who don't need to be on DRUGS...How come the article doesn't come down hard on these people for drugging kids?
pharmaceuticals
posted by Cherlyn on 18 Aug 2010 at 10:43 amWhat sort of kick backs do the doctors get for prescribing these drugs? I think this is a more important reason kids are being mis and over diagnosed.
misdiagnosis - Sensory Processing Disorder vs. ADHD
posted by gmarialisa on 24 Aug 2010 at 7:57 amMany children with Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD) --also known as Sensory Integration Disorder are misdiagnosed with ADHD. Behaviors can look similar, but the underlying cause and treatment can be quite different.
Pharma need to be held accountable
posted by Ann on 26 Aug 2010 at 3:20 amAs American industries go, big pharma is no different than the rest; profit is the number one driving factor. Direct consumer drug advertising, another multi-billion industry, influences choices client/patient makes and indirectly the prescribing physician. Drug industry marketing and PR also tends to sway physician opinions. Let's hold the responsible parties accountable, not their pawns.
Hyperparenting and trophy parents
posted by Teena B, on 15 Nov 2010 at 8:31 pmOne extreme case I know of mis diagnosis. What about the parents who decide that their child needs to spend more time in sports than studying. I know of a parent who does exactly that. He has his child in every sport imaginable through the whole year. This child is expected to do this tough schedule and was getting lower grades like b's and c's. The parents cant even keep up with the sport schedule they enlist family members and friends to help cart their child here and there.
So he had her put on medication so his child would get all a's in school without actually working for it. He thinks that its an accomplishment on his part. By the way the child is also one of the youngest in her grade. This father is all about tropheys and the mother of the child is a nurse and she herself takes medication like xanax.
Parents you really have to ask yourself who are you trying to impress at the risks of the side affects of your child and these drugs. I definitely know case where the child needs the medication and these children are diagnosed at an early age because the symptoms are obvious.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





