Common Osteoporosis Drug Linked To Higher Risk Of Oesophageal Cancer
Featured ArticleMain Category: Bones / Orthopedics
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology; Menopause; Seniors / Aging
Article Date: 03 Sep 2010 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
A new UK study that followed a large number of people found that those who took 10 or more prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates, a group of drugs commonly used to treat the bone disease osteoporosis, were at higher risk of developing oesophageal cancer.
You can read about the research behind this finding in a paper published online in the British Medical Journal, BMJ on 2 September. The study was led by a team from the Cancer Epidemiology Unit at the University of Oxford, and the lead and corresponding author of the paper is Dr Jane Green, a clinical epidemiologist at the Unit.
In Europe and North America, the risk of developing oesophageal cancer is very small, typically about 1 per 1,000 people aged 60 to 79 over five years.
Green and colleagues estimated that taking 10 or more prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates and taking them over a period of five years doubles that risk.
However, the authors themselves and experts commenting in an accompanying editorial said this evidence is not enough to justify doctors changing their prescription policy, but they should perhaps prescribe more cautiously and be more vigilant about follow up.
In many countries, including the UK and the US, oral bisphosphonates are the recommended first line drugs for preventing bone fracture in people with osteoporosis, a common disease that affects especially postmenopausal women.
In their paper, the authors note that prescribing of bisphosphonates is increasing; for example in the UK, the percentage of women aged over 70 receiving prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates has gone up from 3 per cent in 2000 to 10 per cent in 2005.
For their study they searched the UK General Practice Research Database cohort for cases where men and women aged 40 and over, with oesophageal (2,954 cases), gastric (2,018), and colorectal (10,641) cancer, diagnosed beween 1995 and 2005, and their prescription medication were being followed.
To estimate the relative risk of incident invasive cancer of the oesophagus, stomach, or colorectum, they matched the cancer cases with controls (5 controls per case) of the same age, sex, attending the same general practice, and who were followed for the same period.
After adjusting the results for known risk factors such as smoking, alcohol and body mass index, the researchers found that:
- The rate of oesophageal cancer was increased in patients with one or more previous prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates compared with those who had no prescriptions (relative risk RR was 1.30, 95% confidence interval CI ranged from 1.02 to1.66; statistical significance P=0.02).
- However, this risk was significantly higher in those patients whose records showed they had 10 or more prescriptions (RR 1.93, CI 1.37 to 2.70), compared to those who had 9 or less (RR 0.93, CC 0.66 to 1.31; P for heterogeneity=0.002).
- This was also the case for patients whose records showed they took the drugs for over 3 years: eg for an average of about 5 years, the RR for prescription vs no prescription was 2.24, with CI 1.47 to 3.43.
- Oesophageal cancer risk did not differ significantly by bisphosphonate type, and for patients taking 10 or more prescriptions, it did not vary by age, gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, or body mass index.
- And neither did it vary by diagnosis of osteoporosis, fracture, or upper gastrointestinal disease, nor by whether the patients were also prescribed acid suppressants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or corticosteroids.
- Stomach and colorectal cancers were not associated with being prescribed with bisphosphonates.
"The risk of oesophageal cancer increased with 10 or more prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates and with prescriptions over about a five year period."
They explained that this approximately doubles the small risk of developing oesophageal cancer, which in Europe and North America is about 1 per 1,000 people aged 60-79.
They wrote that treatment of osteoporosis is a growing public health concern, "with large scale clinical and economic implications", and that if confirmed, these findings "would add to our knowledge of the risks and benefits of use of oral bisphosphonates".
However, they stressed that further studies are needed to "confirm or refute" these findings, and particularly to "examine the associations between use of different types and formulations of bisphosphonates and risk of the different histological types of oesophageal cancer".
Green and colleagues also mention a JAMA study published last month conducted by Cardwell et al, that also used the UK General Practice Research Database but found no link between oral bisphosphonates and risk of oesophageal cancer.
However, they suggest the reason this study has found a link and the JAMA one did not, was the difference in the observation time: Cardwell et al analysed data covering an average of 4.5 years whereas Green et al covered 7.7 years on average:
"Our study thus had the potential to include people with longer durations of bisphosphonate use and also had greater statistical power, with five matched controls per case compared with equal numbers in the exposed and comparison groups in Cardwell et al's study," they write.
"Oral bisphosphonates and risk of cancer of oesophagus, stomach, and colorectum: case-control analysis within a UK primary care cohort."
Jane Green, Gabriela Czanner, Gillian Reeves, Joanna Watson, Lesley Wise, and Valerie Beral.
BMJ 2010; 341:c4444
Published online 2 September 2010
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c4444
Related article:
Use Of Certain Drugs To Treat Osteoporosis Not Associated With Increased Risk Of Esophageal Or Gastric Cancer (Aug 2010)
Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/199896.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/199896.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
wider indirect mortality due to Oestoporosis
posted by ERIC MACKAY on 3 Sep 2010 at 5:04 amCould it be conceivable to estimate the indirect effect on mortality rates in the elderly due to the non-treatment for Osteoporosis and compare it with the potentially positive effect of this course of treatment?
Oral vs injected bisphosphonates
posted by Dan on 3 Sep 2010 at 5:44 amDid anyone ask the researchers if they have done or intend to investigate any potential association of the injected forms of bisphosphonates (BP's)with the target cancers, e.g., drugs like Reclast (5 mg zoledronic acid annually for osteoporosis), or much higher doses of zoledronic acid used to treat bone disease occurring with certain cancers? Essentially, does BP use of any kind raise the risk of esophageal cancer, or is any potential such risk associated only with oral forms? The oral forms are known to be quire irritating to the esophagus.
esophageal cancer vs brokeh hip risk
posted by Patricia Kuzen on 3 Sep 2010 at 11:46 pmI am a pharmacist. While I would prefer that nobody have to take the biphosphonates due to side effects, the trauma and debilitation caused by a broken hip in elderly women is catastrophic and very common. I probably hear from family members about half-a-dozen times a year that "Mom fell and broke her hip".
I run a small pharmacy in a small town, so 6 or so patients a year is a high percentage of my elderly female patients. Many times, this seems to be the beginning of the end...they get pneumonia or some other complication that arises from being bedridden and sometimes they die from it...It is a tough decision, but I would opt for, if I was the age these women are, an increased cancer risk vs a broken hip.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



