Checklist May Help Identify Autism Earlier On In Life
Editor's ChoiceAcademic Journal
Main Category: Autism
Also Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health; Psychology / Psychiatry; Mental Health
Article Date: 01 May 2011 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.06 (18 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.82 (11 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
Identifying autism as early in life as possible increases the chances of being treated sooner, which improves a child's subsequent learning and development. A new checklist that only takes five minutes for parents to complete at doctor's waiting rooms might well help do this, researchers from the University of California, San Diego, reported in the Journal of Pediatrics.
Unfortunately, too many children are being diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder a very long time after their parents first notice and report concerns about their child. In many cases the child is not diagnosed until well after he/she starts school.
Thomas R. Insel, M.D., director of the National Institute of Mental Health, said:
"Beyond this exciting proof of concept, such a screening program would answer parents' concerns about their child's possible ASD symptoms earlier and with more confidence than has ever been done before."
Karen Pierce, Ph.D. and team set up a network of 137 pediatricians in San Diego County. The pediatricians attended a one-hour seminar, after which all 1-year-old babies were screened using the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist. This is a short questionnaire in which parents and caregivers fill in data regarding the baby's gestures, gaze, words, sounds, and other communication signals appropriate for a 1-year-old.
The authors say the checklist can help spot language delay, developmental delay, and also ASD (autism spectrum disorder).
Children who failed the screen were referred for further testing and reassessed twice yearly until they were three years old.
32 out of 10,479 screened children were found to have ASD. After taking into account regression and late onset cases, the numbers correlated with what one would expect from 12-month-old babies, the authors added. The screening process appeared to provide a 75% accuracy diagnosis, when those identified as having developmental and language delay, or some other form of delay were included.
Those found to have developmental delay, 89% of those with language delay and the children diagnosed with ASD went on to have behavioral therapy. Treatment started when the children were approximately 17 months old - this compares to a national average of 5.7 years of age for diagnoses and treatment coming later, according to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
Very few of the participating pediatricians had been screening babies for ASD systematically before the study began. 96% of the pediatricians thought the program was good. 100% of them continued it.
Dr. Pierce said:
"In the context of a virtual lack of universal screening at 12 months, this program is one that could be adopted by any pediatric office, at virtually no cost, and can aid in the identification of children with true developmental delays."
The authors say more studies are required to redefine the screening tool, monitor kids for longer, and to determine what barriers there are in treatment follow-up.
The Questionnaire
Below are the questions asked in the checklist for the parent or caregiver to complete. It is called the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist."Emotion and Eye Gaze
- Do you know when your child is happy and when your child is upset?
- When your child plays with toys, does he/she look at you to see if you are watching?
- Does your child smile or laugh while looking at you?
- When you look at and point to a toy across the room, does your child look at it?
- Does your child let you know that he/she needs help or wants an object out of reach?
- When you are not paying attention to your child, does he/she try to get your attention?
- Does your child do things just to get you to laugh?
- Does your child try to get you to notice interesting objects - just to get you to look at the objects, not to get you to do anything with them?
- Does your child pick up objects and give them to you?
- Does your child show objects to you without giving you the object?
- Does your child wave to greet people?
- Does your child point to objects?
- Does your child nod his/her head to indicate yes?
- Does your child use sounds or words to get attention or help?
- Does your child string sounds together, such as uh, oh, mama, gaga, bye bye, bada?
- About how many of the following consonant sounds does your child use: ma, na, ba, da, ga, wa, la, ya, sa, sha?
- When you call your child's name, does he/she respond by looking or turning toward you?
- About how many different words or phrases does your child understand without gestures? E.g., if you say "where's your tummy," "where's Daddy", "give me the ball," or "come here" without showing or pointing, your child will respond appropriately.
- Does your child show interest in playing with a variety of objects?
- About how many of the following objects does your child use appropriately: cup, bottle, bowl, spoon, comb or brush, toothbrush, washcloth, ball, toy vehicle, toy telephone?
- About how many blocks or rings does your child stack?
- Does your child pretend to play with toys (e.g. feed a stuffed animal, put a doll to sleep, put an animal figure in a vehicle)?
"Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist" (The Checklist - PDF)
By Amy M. Wetherby, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, & Barry M. Prizant, Ph.D., CCC-SLP
"Catching, Studying, and Treating Autism Early: The 1-Yr Well-Baby Check-Up Approach"
Pierce K, Carter C, Weinfeld M, Desmond J, Hazin R, Bjork R, Gallagher N.
Journal of Pediatrics. 2011 Apr.
Written by Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
23 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/223808.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/223808.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Autism Quick Office Test
posted by Joel on 30 Apr 2011 at 10:56 amOur son is now 55 years old. We noted that his development was was most untypical starting at approximately 2 months. All doctors involved in his care at that time and in the following two years said not to worry there were "alarmists". The word "autism" did not exist in 1956-58. Eventually, at the behest of a nursery school teacher (he was now 3 yrs old) we entered the mental health system. He was given a tentative label as schizophrenic and we, the parents--ESPECIALLY his mother were blamed for his condition. We accepted the "blame" for a year and a half until the birth of a perfectly normal child. We sought further medical/psychiatric opinions and found that we were being brutalized and misled. Over the years, we remained active in getting programs started for children with this atypical condition which was a sickness in search of a name. Finally, the word "autism" began to appear over and over. Today, it is referred to as an epidemic. In reading the literature over the years, it seems that the "refrigerator mother" was not the accepted cause...it was the mercury based preservative in early childhood inoculations. Never proven. Then it was the triple injections at the same time. Still not proven. What I have noted in covering the literature on autism since it came into general use is: except for the changes in terminology, it reads just about exactly the same as it did 40 years ago! Having decided that it was not caused by "bad, bad, momma", and that early intervention (as in all diseases) was critical to progress along with a vast new array of pharmaceutical products could be employed, no real scientific understanding or clearly effective explanation has been found. Truthfully, as you so often state, the problem grows; but, the answers remain conjectures and your literature of today resembles the literature of 40 years ago except for the changes of terms. The quick test is the latest superficial attempt to demonstrate " progress". The answers to these questions are far too broad; but meet the need for instant answers to a tragic problem (believe me, my wife and I know) towards which your psychological/psychiatric "researchers" have found NO answer in the past 40-50 years but to give it a name. In my non-humble opinion, the test is tepid.
typo?
posted by Erin B on 30 Apr 2011 at 3:04 pmI really hope that was supposed to be "comb or brush." 12 months seems early for terrorism screening.
Editor's note: Thanks Erin. It was a most unfortunate typo. :)
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





