Mobile Phone Masts Do Not Make You Ill
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Allergy
Also Included In: Public Health; Psychology / Psychiatry; Mental Health
Article Date: 26 Jul 2007 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.6 (10 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.38 (8 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
A major UK three-year study has indicated that mobile phone masks do not make you sick - they are not the cause of the symptoms of ill health claimed by some people. Such symptoms as nausea, fatigue and anxiety may feel genuine, according to the Environmental Health Perspectives study, but they are not triggered by the masts.
Mast Sanity, a campaign group, says the findings are unreliable because 12 participants in the trial dropped out due to ill health.
Numerous people during the trial blamed the masts for their symptoms when they were told they were turned on. However, dozens thought the mast was on when it was off and still felt the symptoms, while others felt well when they thought the masts were off (when they were, in fact, on). The study indicates the problem is a psychological one.
Study leader, Elaine Fox, University of Essex, explained that belief is a powerful thing. "If you really believe something is going to do you some harm, it will."
Electro-sensitivity is believed by a number of individuals to be an allergy to such modern day appliances as mobile phone masts and hair driers.
A previous UK study, carried out by the HPA (Health Protection Agency) reported there was no evidence that showed an association between electrical equipment and ill health. That study, however, did not examine the effects the waves from phone masts might have. This latest study has done just that.
Scientists studied a total of 44 participants, excluding the 12 who dropped out. All the 44 had reported symptoms. They were compared to a control group of 114 who had never complained of ill effects from phone masts.
When both groups were told a signal was being emitted from the phone masts - both GSM and UMTS (3G), those who had reported symptoms said they did not feel well.
However, when the trial was double-blind, the number of symptoms reported was completely random. In other words, when neither testers nor participants knew whether the masts were emitting or not, the participants' reports of feeling ill did not correspond at all with the masts' emissions or lack of emissions.
5 people out of the control group of 114 guessed correctly when emissions were taking place, and 2 did the same from the group of 44. The researchers said this proportion is what is expected by chance.
Even though it seems the 'sensitive' people reported symptoms at random, their symptoms were real - their blood pressure had risen and their perspiration had increased. Despite their symptoms not synchronizing with emitting phone masts, these physiological reactions did occur.
The researchers concluded that the range of symptoms and physiological responses do not appear to be related to the presence of either GSM or 3G signals.
"Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomised Provocation Study"
Stacy Eltiti, Denise Wallace, Anna Ridgewell, Konstantina Zougkou, Riccardo Russo, Francisco Sepulveda, Dariush Mirshekar-Syahkal, Paul Rasor, Roger Deeble, and Elaine Fox
Environ Health Perspect doi:10.1289/ehp.10286
-- Click here to view abstract (pdf)
-- Click here to view full article (pdf)
Written by: Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/77888.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/77888.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Safe? You CANNOT Be Serious!!!
posted by A White on 26 Jul 2007 at 3:46 amSorry but no way. I had no opinion either way until I was viewing a house a couple of years ago that had one of these masts in the grounds very close to the property. I was with 3 other people at the time.
All 4 of us were there for less than 30 mins and we ALL had BLINDING headaches by the time we left!!!
We were're set against masts in any way until that point.
I should also mention that the house had stood empty for quite a long time due to the ill health of the previous owners!!!!!
This was absolutely conclusive for me and I feel VERY sorry for anyone that is misled into believing these are safe.
Phone Mast Sagety.
posted by Anon on 14 Jul 2008 at 3:43 pmThe study would have had more credibility if it had studied the health of communities who had lived in the shadow of masts for many years.
I have lived near a significant collecton of masts for nearly 16 years, and a Tetra system, which was activated about five years ago. After being diagnosed with an agressive breast cancer in 2004, I began to research the suspected effects on health from living in close proximity to phone masts. After suffering from persistent ill health for many years, it was disconcerting to find that many of my problems matched those stated in the research I read. I am currently recovering from major surgery for suspected cancer of the uterus - how many cancers do we need to arouse a hint of suspicion. Many of my neighbours have health problems and many near neighbours have had cancer diagnosed in the past few years.
According to a patient of his, a local consultant haematologist has noted a higher than average level of leukaemia in the area and believes the masts are influencing this.
The medical community needs to be proactive in collecting information about the illnesses experienced by those exposed to mucrowaves to determine whether there is a public health issue which needs addressing. Some serious and purposeful research is needed - not a study which tinkers around the edges as the Essex study did.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




