Common Antibiotics Are Not Always Best
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses
Also Included In: Blood / Hematology
Article Date: 17 Aug 2012 - 13:00 PST
Common Antibiotics Are Not Always Best
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
A new study, appearing in an upcoming issue of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN), has evidence that the most commonly used antibiotic treating bloodstream infections in dialysis patients, vancomycin, might not be the best choice.
A bloodstream infection, also known as bacteremia, occurs when bacteria enters the bloodstream either by infection, wound, injection or a surgical procedure. Symptoms include high fever, rapid heart rate, chills, vomiting, and nausea. This infection becomes life threatening when a bacteria called Staphylococcus aureus is found.
Fortunately, medicine can often cure this infection. Over 80% of people are likely to die from bloodstream infections if they do not receive any antibiotic treatment.
In order to determine which was the best prescription drug to use, Kevin Chan, MD (Fresenius Medical Care North America and Massachusetts General Hospital) and his colleagues examined the differences between various antibiotics, analyzing the effectiveness of each drug at preventing hospitalization and death.
Searching for methicillin-sensitive strains of S. aureus bloodstream infection, authors observed over 500,000 blood culture results from their chronic kidney database, while checking if they took vancomycin or cefazolin to treat these infections.
Most experts have considered vancomycin as the better antibiotic because it can protect against many strains of bacteria. However there are other factors that need to be considered when choosing the best drug, such as the medication's killing power and tissue penetration.
Results showed:
- 56% of patients still took vancomycin even after blood culture showed that S. aureus bacteria were susceptible to cefazolin, and only 17% used cefazolin
- A 38% lower rate of hospitalization and death was seen in patients who took cefazolin when compared with those who used vancomycin
- A 48% lower rate of sepsis, the most severe form of bloodstream infection, was seen in the cefazolin-treated patients
"I think the data suggest there is an opportunity to improve outcomes for patients through appropriate antibiotic selection."
Written by Sarah Glynn
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
Kevin E. Chan, H. Shaw Warren, Ravi I. Thadhani, David J.R. Steele, Jeffrey L. Hymes, Franklin W. Maddux and Raymond M. Hakim
JASN, August 2012, doi:10.1681/ASN.2012010050
MLA
23 May. 2013. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/249186.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/249186.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Common Antibiotics Are Not Always Best'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



