Medical Costs For Back And Neck Problems Are Rising, But Health Outcomes Are Not Improving

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Back Pain
Also Included In: Bones / Orthopedics;  Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP;  Public Health
Article Date: 12 Feb 2008 - 13:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  

The amount of money people spend to treat their back and neck problems has increased substantially in the last decade. Despite this, their health status does not seem to be comparably improving, according to a study in the February 13 issue of JAMA.

In clinical practice, back and neck problems are some of the most commonly experienced symptoms. In 2002, a survey of adults in the United states showed 26 percent reporting lower back pain and 14 percent reporting neck pain in the three months previous, according to the background information in the article. Imaging and therapy rates for back and neck/spine problems have increased considerably in the last decade, but it is not clear how this has affected expenditures or health outcomes for patients with these problems.

In this article, Brook I. Martin, M.P.H., of the University of Washington, Seattle, and colleagues conducted a study to analyze just this. They used data from the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 1997-2005. Of the total of 23,045 U.S. Adults over the age of 17 who responded in 1997, 3,139 reported spine problems. In 2005, of total 22,258 respondents, 3,187 reported spine problems.

Those with spine problems had higher expenditures than those without, according to the researchers. After adjusting for age, sex, and inflation, the average expenditure of a patients with spine problems in 1997 was $4,695, in contrast with $2,731 for those without. In 2005, the average for those with spine problems was $6,096, while those without spent an average of just $3,516. From 1997 to 2005, this shows an estimated 65 percent inflation-adjusted increase in total expenditure of adults with spine problems. This is a more rapid increase than overall health expenditures.

Many of the differences observed in these inflation-adjusted expenditures between those with and without spine problems in 2005 could be attributed to outpatients services (36%) and inpatients services (28 percent.) To a lesser extent, prescription medications (23 percent), emergency department visits (3 percent) and home health, dental, and other expenses (10 percent) accounted for the discrepancy.

Physical functioning limitations reported by persons with back or neck problems increased from an estimated 20.7 percent to 24.7 percent from 1997 to 2005. Accordingly, self-reported measures of mental health, physical functioning, limitations at work or in school, and limitations in social settings among adults with spine problems were worsened from 1997 to 2005.

The authors conclude that spine problems are a significant contribution to medical costs without direct improvements in the health outcomes. "These data suggest that spine problems are expensive, due both to large numbers of affected persons and to high costs per person. We did not observe improvements in health outcomes commensurate with the increasing costs over time. Spine problems may offer opportunities to reduce expenditures without associated worsening of clinical outcomes."

Expenditures and Health Status Among Adults With Back and Neck Problems
Brook I. Martin, Richard A. Deyo, MD, MPH, Sohail K. Mirza, Judith A. Turner, Bryan A. Comstock, William Hollingworth, Sean D. Sullivan
JAMA, February 13, 2008-Vol 299, No. 6
http://jama.ama-assn.org

Written by Anna Sophia McKenney
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

• Additional
• References
• Citations