Hospitals may become criminally liable for MRSA infection, UK
Main Category: MRSA / Drug ResistanceArticle Date: 16 May 2005 - 10:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (4 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
UK Health Secretary, Patricia Hewitt, says UK hospitals should face the same strict hygiene regulations that factories do - hospital managers should have a legal duty to protect patients from MRSA.
If the Labour government's plans materialise, hospitals may become criminally liable for MRSA infection.
Patricia Hewitt would like to make it easier for patients to sue for medical negligence. She said it is wrong for factories to have stricter hygiene laws than the country's hospitals.
N.B.Health is a devolved issue in Scotland. Any decision on the issue to criminalise hospitals would have to be taken by the Scottish Parliament.
What is MRSA?
SOURCE: University of Edinburgh
The organism Staphylococcus aureus is found on many individuals skin and seems to cause no major problems. However if it gets inside the body, for instance under the skin or into the lungs, it can cause important infections such as boils or pneumonia. Individuals who carry this organism are usually totally healthy, have no problems whatever and are considered simply to be carriers of the organism.
The term MRSA or methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus is used to describe those examples of this organism that are resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Methicillin was an antibiotic used many years ago to treat patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections. It is now no longer used except as a means of identifying this particular type of antibiotic resistance.
Individuals can become carriers of MRSA in the same way that they can become a carrier of ordinary Staphylococcus aureus which is by physical contact with the organism. If the organism is on the skin then it can be passed around by physical contact. If the organism is in the nose or is associated with the lungs rather than the skin then it may be passed around by droplet spread from the mouth and nose. We can find out if and where Staphylococcus aureus is located on a patient by taking various samples, sending them to the laboratory and growing the organism. Tests done on any Staphylococcus aureus grown from such specimens can then decide how sensitive the organisms is to antibiotics and if it is a methicillin resistant (MRSA) organism. These test usually take 2-3 days.
Visit our mrsa / drug resistance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/24476.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/24476.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
MRSA: Clean up don't cover up
posted by Gavin Mitchell on 19 Sep 2005 at 3:07 amMy mother died on the 1st of August 2005 after being admitted to the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley with a heart attack.
The immediate family discovered purely by chance that she had contracted MRSA on a previous stay in the same hospital some two years earlier. The fact only came to light by chance when my sister caught site of her medical file which had an MRSA warning sticker on the cover. At no stage had medical staff informed either my mother, or family members of her condition.
She had been released back into the community after that previous stay in hospital, and worse still into a care home, where an open wound on her leg was proved mysteriously stubborn to heal. We now know she was suffering from MRSA, and remain very concerned that those changing her dressings and caring for her were blissfully unaware of that fact at the time.
Following her death We managed to get significant press coverage of the 'cover-up', yet annoyingly I read that microbiologists argue that the media are creating an increased atmosphere of fear in the community, aimed more at generating increased newspaper sales and scoring political points. There is no smoke without fire, so as a web developer I have published the following site: http://www.nhsmrsa.com just to add a bit of heat to the debate.
Anyone visiting the Royal Alexandra Hospital, and observing the disgraceful lack of cleanliness, not least in the public toilets, can quickly conclude that the spread of infection is hardly surprising. The day before she died, my mother (an ex nurse) complained bitterly to me about the lack of hygiene standards, and went to her death not even realsising she had MRSA.
The NHS cleaning up their act is not just a matter of addressing microbiology, perhaps things might change by addressing accountability all the way from the front door of the hospital to court proceedings.It is encouraging to see that Patrica Hewitt has proposed making legal proceedings easier, it would be more pleasing to see more visible action on the matter. How about less talk, more soap?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




