Plenty of research has suggested that owning a dog can be beneficial to health. Two new studies now add to the existing evidence, finding an association between dog ownership and a significantly lower death risk following a stroke or heart attack.
“The findings in these two well-done studies and analyses build upon prior studies and the conclusions of the 2013 [American Heart Association] scientific statement ‘Pet Ownership and Cardiovascular Risk‘ — that dog ownership is associated with reductions in factors that contribute to cardiac risk and to cardiovascular events,” says Dr. Glenn Levine, chair of the writing group that authored this scientific statement.
“Further, these two studies provide good, quality data indicating [that] dog ownership is associated with reduced cardiac and all-cause mortality,” Dr. Levine, who was not involved in this research, adds.
“While these non-randomized studies cannot ‘prove’ that adopting or owning a dog directly leads to reduced mortality, these robust findings are certainly at least suggestive of this.”
Dr. Glenn Levine
Previous research has suggested that people who live with dogs appear to have a much lower risk of both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, compared with individuals who do not count dogs among their family members.
The results of both studies appear in the journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.
The first study — conducted by researchers from Uppsala University and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, both in Uppsala, Sweden — used the Swedish National Patient Register to identify individuals aged 40–85 who had experienced either a heart attack or an ischemic stroke between 2001 and 2012.
In total, this amounted to 344,272 individuals, of whom 186, 421 had experienced a heart attack and 157,851 a stroke within this period. To find out how many of these people owned dogs, the researchers consulted Swedish Board of Agriculture and Swedish Kennel Club records.
The researchers found that in this cohort, people who owned dogs had better health prospects than those who did not.
Specifically, people who had experienced a heart attack between 2001 and 2012 and who owned a dog had a 33% lower risk of death after hospitalization if they otherwise lived alone and a 15% lower death risk if they owned a dog and lived with a partner or child.
As for people who had experienced a stroke and owned a dog, if they otherwise lived alone after hospitalization, they had a 27% lower risk of death, and if they also lived with a partner or a child, they had a 12% lower risk of death.
The researchers believe that the decrease in death risk for dog owners could be explained by the fact that having a dog forces people to become more physically active.
Dogs also help people feel less lonely and experience fewer negative moods, which may contribute to better overall health.
“We know that social isolation is a strong risk factor for worse health outcomes and premature death,” says Prof. Tove Fall, who co-authored this study.
“Previous studies have indicated that dog owners experience less social isolation and have more interaction with other people. Furthermore, keeping a dog is a good motivation for physical activity, which is an important factor in rehabilitation and mental health,” Prof. Fall explains.
While their results are based on data from a very large cohort, the researchers admit that certain factors may have skewed the findings. Some of these factors the researchers were unable to verify, such as shared ownership of a dog, loss of a dog, or a change of ownership.
Still, “The results of this study suggest positive effects of dog ownership for patients who have experienced a heart attack or stroke,” Prof. Fall notes. “However, more research is needed to confirm a causal relationship and [give] recommendations about prescribing dogs for prevention,” she adds.
She also cautions that these results are not meant to motivate people to buy or adopt dogs as “medicine” without considering what owning a dog really entails.
“Moreover, from an animal welfare perspective, dogs should only be acquired by people who feel they have the capacity and knowledge to give the pet a good life,” Prof. Tove emphasizes.
The second study comes from Mount Sinai Hospital, in Toronto, Canada, and it is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies, collectively featuring data from 3,837,005 people.
Of these studies, nine compared all-cause mortality outcomes for people who did or did not own dogs, and four looked specifically at cardiovascular health outcomes in these demographics.
This review also found that people who own dogs have better health outcomes, compared with those who do not. Dog owners, the review authors note, have a 24% lower risk of all-cause mortality, a 65% lower risk of death after a heart attack, and a 31% lower risk of death from cardiovascular causes.
“As such,” she adds, “the findings that people who owned dogs lived longer and their risk for cardiovascular death was also lower are somewhat expected.”
At the same time, the researcher points out that she and her team were unable to account for some confounding factors, including “better fitness or an overall healthier lifestyle that could be associated with dog ownership.”
“The results, however, were very positive,” she maintains. “The next step on this topic would be an interventional study to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes after adopting a dog and the social and psychological benefits of dog ownership,” Dr. Kramer suggests.